QIS vs. FARX
QIS (Simplify Multi-Qis Alternative ETF) and FARX (Frontier Asset Absolute Return ETF) are both Multistrategy funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, QIS returned -50.57% vs 16.87% for FARX. At a 0.15 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. Both charge a 1.00% expense ratio.
Performance
QIS vs. FARX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QIS achieves a -30.59% return, which is significantly lower than FARX's 7.40% return.
QIS
- 1D
- -2.72%
- 1M
- -21.94%
- YTD
- -30.59%
- 6M
- -33.19%
- 1Y
- -50.57%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FARX
- 1D
- -0.76%
- 1M
- -1.54%
- YTD
- 7.40%
- 6M
- 6.75%
- 1Y
- 16.87%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
QIS vs. FARX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
QIS Simplify Multi-Qis Alternative ETF | -30.59% | -38.02% | 0.10% |
FARX Frontier Asset Absolute Return ETF | 7.40% | 10.61% | 0.04% |
Correlation
The correlation between QIS and FARX is 0.25, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.25 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 20, 2024 | 0.15 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QIS vs. FARX — Risk / Return Rank
QIS
FARX
QIS vs. FARX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Simplify Multi-Qis Alternative ETF (QIS) and Frontier Asset Absolute Return ETF (FARX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| QIS | FARX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -3.63 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -5.21 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.76 | 1.45 | -0.68 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.92 | 6.06 | -6.98 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.58 | 18.41 | -19.99 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
QIS vs. FARX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QIS drawdown since its inception was -59.30%, which is greater than FARX's maximum drawdown of -5.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QIS and FARX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QIS | FARX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -59.30% | -5.83% | -53.47% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -55.12% | -2.80% | -52.32% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -59.30% | -2.30% | -57.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -14.45% | -1.05% | -13.40% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 32.10% | 0.92% | +31.18% |
Volatility
QIS vs. FARX - Volatility Comparison
Simplify Multi-Qis Alternative ETF (QIS) has a higher volatility of 11.78% compared to Frontier Asset Absolute Return ETF (FARX) at 2.33%. This indicates that QIS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FARX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QIS | FARX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.78% | 2.33% | +9.45% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 30.41% | 5.85% | +24.56% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 38.95% | 7.28% | +31.67% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 29.38% | 7.04% | +22.34% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 29.38% | 7.04% | +22.34% |
QIS vs. FARX - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both QIS and FARX have an expense ratio of 1.00%.
Dividends
QIS vs. FARX - Dividend Comparison
QIS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.94%, less than FARX's 2.95% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
FARX Frontier Asset Absolute Return ETF | 2.95% | 3.25% | 0.19% | 0.00% |
QIS Simplify Multi-Qis Alternative ETF | 1.94% | 3.37% | 1.07% | 3.29% |
Frequently Asked Questions
QIS and FARX have a correlation of 0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
QIS has higher volatility (11.78%) compared to FARX (2.33%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QIS dropped -59.30% vs FARX's -5.83%.
On 1-year performance, FARX leads with 16.87% vs -50.57% for QIS. Both ETFs have the same 1.00% expense ratio. On volatility, FARX has been the lower-risk option at 2.33%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, FARX has performed better with a 16.87% return vs -50.57%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
QIS and FARX have the same expense ratio: 1.00% per year.
FARX has the higher dividend yield at 2.95%, compared with 1.94% for QIS.
They also come from different issuers: Simplify and Frontier.
FARX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.33 vs -1.30), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for QIS and FARX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer