QHFRX vs. QLFNX
QHFRX (AQR MS Fusion HV Fund Class R6) and QLFNX (AQR LSE Fusion Fund Class N) are both mutual funds - QHFRX is a Multistrategy fund actively managed by AQR, while QLFNX is a Long-Short fund actively managed by AQR. Both are actively managed. Their correlation of 0.89 suggests significant overlap in exposure. QHFRX charges 6.59%/yr vs 6.55%/yr for QLFNX.
Performance
QHFRX vs. QLFNX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QHFRX achieves a 3.72% return, which is significantly higher than QLFNX's 0.50% return.
QHFRX
- 1D
- -0.24%
- 1M
- 9.35%
- YTD
- 3.72%
- 6M
- 7.91%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
QLFNX
- 1D
- -0.25%
- 1M
- 6.62%
- YTD
- 0.50%
- 6M
- 4.01%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
QHFRX vs. QLFNX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
QHFRX AQR MS Fusion HV Fund Class R6 | 3.72% | 5.06% |
QLFNX AQR LSE Fusion Fund Class N | 0.50% | 6.71% |
Correlation
The correlation between QHFRX and QLFNX is 0.89, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 7, 2025 | 0.89 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QHFRX vs. QLFNX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AQR MS Fusion HV Fund Class R6 (QHFRX) and AQR LSE Fusion Fund Class N (QLFNX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| QHFRX | QLFNX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.01 | 0.88 | +0.14 |
Drawdowns
QHFRX vs. QLFNX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QHFRX drawdown since its inception was -13.76%, smaller than the maximum QLFNX drawdown of -14.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QHFRX and QLFNX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QHFRX | QLFNX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -13.76% | -14.54% | +0.78% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.24% | -0.74% | +0.50% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.98% | -5.70% | +0.72% |
Volatility
QHFRX vs. QLFNX - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QHFRX | QLFNX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.40% | 15.93% | +0.47% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.40% | 15.93% | +0.47% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.40% | 15.93% | +0.47% |
QHFRX vs. QLFNX - Expense Ratio Comparison
QHFRX has a 6.59% expense ratio, which is higher than QLFNX's 6.55% expense ratio.
Dividends
QHFRX vs. QLFNX - Dividend Comparison
QHFRX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while QLFNX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.14%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
QHFRX AQR MS Fusion HV Fund Class R6 | 0.00% | 0.00% |
QLFNX AQR LSE Fusion Fund Class N | 0.14% | 0.14% |
Frequently Asked Questions
QHFRX and QLFNX have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for QHFRX and QLFNX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer