QHFNX vs. RMDFX

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

QHFNX (AQR MS Fusion HV Fund Fund Class N) and RMDFX (Aspiriant Defensive Allocation Fund) are both Multistrategy funds. At a 0.36 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. QHFNX charges 6.94%/yr vs 0.18%/yr for RMDFX.

Performance

QHFNX vs. RMDFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AQR MS Fusion HV Fund Fund Class N (QHFNX) and Aspiriant Defensive Allocation Fund (RMDFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QHFNX achieves a 3.38% return, which is significantly lower than RMDFX's 7.32% return.

QHFNX

• 1D: -0.16%
• 1M: 8.82%
• YTD: 3.38%
• 6M: 6.82%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

RMDFX

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 1.35%
• YTD: 7.32%
• 6M: 8.65%
• 1Y: 19.87%
• 3Y*: 11.18%
• 5Y*: 5.21%
• 10Y*: 5.40%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QHFNX vs. RMDFX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
QHFNX AQR MS Fusion HV Fund Fund Class N	3.38%	4.97%
RMDFX Aspiriant Defensive Allocation Fund	7.32%	3.25%

Correlation

The correlation between QHFNX and RMDFX is 0.36, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 7, 2025	0.36

Return for Risk

QHFNX vs. RMDFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RMDFX

RMDFX Risk / Return Rank: 95
RMDFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
RMDFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 98
RMDFX Omega Ratio Rank: 97
RMDFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 91
RMDFX Martin Ratio Rank: 92

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QHFNX vs. RMDFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AQR MS Fusion HV Fund Fund Class N (QHFNX) and Aspiriant Defensive Allocation Fund (RMDFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	QHFNX	RMDFX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	4.33	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.83	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.87	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.97	0.84	+0.13

Drawdowns

QHFNX vs. RMDFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QHFNX drawdown since its inception was -13.87%, smaller than the maximum RMDFX drawdown of -15.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QHFNX and RMDFX.

Drawdown Indicators

	QHFNX	RMDFX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-13.87%	-15.96%	+2.09%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-4.19%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-5.79%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-14.63%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-15.96%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.41%	0.00%	-0.41%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.01%	-3.33%	-1.68%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	1.07%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	QHFNX	RMDFX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	1.41%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	3.96%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.24%	4.63%	+11.61%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.24%	6.34%	+9.90%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.24%	6.22%	+10.02%

QHFNX vs. RMDFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

QHFNX has a 6.94% expense ratio, which is higher than RMDFX's 0.18% expense ratio.

Dividends

QHFNX vs. RMDFX - Dividend Comparison

QHFNX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while RMDFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.32%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016
QHFNX AQR MS Fusion HV Fund Fund Class N	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
RMDFX Aspiriant Defensive Allocation Fund	4.32%	4.63%	0.00%	3.69%	0.78%	5.37%	2.28%	3.78%	4.11%	2.16%	1.16%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both QHFNX and RMDFX in my portfolio?

QHFNX and RMDFX have a correlation of 0.36, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.