PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QHFNX vs. QLFNX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

QHFNX vs. QLFNX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AQR MS Fusion HV Fund Fund Class N (QHFNX) and AQR LSE Fusion Fund Class N (QLFNX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QHFNX achieves a 3.38% return, which is significantly higher than QLFNX's 0.17% return.


QHFNX

1D
-0.16%
1M
8.82%
YTD
3.38%
6M
6.82%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

QLFNX

1D
-0.33%
1M
5.52%
YTD
0.17%
6M
3.31%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QHFNX vs. QLFNX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
QHFNX
AQR MS Fusion HV Fund Fund Class N
3.38%4.97%
QLFNX
AQR LSE Fusion Fund Class N
0.17%6.71%

Correlation

The correlation between QHFNX and QLFNX is 0.89, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 7, 2025

0.89

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QHFNX vs. QLFNX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AQR MS Fusion HV Fund Fund Class N (QHFNX) and AQR LSE Fusion Fund Class N (QLFNX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

QHFNX vs. QLFNX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


QHFNXQLFNXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.97

0.83

+0.14

Drawdowns

QHFNX vs. QLFNX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QHFNX drawdown since its inception was -13.87%, roughly equal to the maximum QLFNX drawdown of -14.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QHFNX and QLFNX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QHFNXQLFNXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-13.87%

-14.54%

+0.67%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.41%

-1.07%

+0.66%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.01%

-5.67%

+0.66%

Volatility

QHFNX vs. QLFNX - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QHFNXQLFNXDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.24%

15.88%

+0.36%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.24%

15.88%

+0.36%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.24%

15.88%

+0.36%

QHFNX vs. QLFNX - Expense Ratio Comparison

QHFNX has a 6.94% expense ratio, which is higher than QLFNX's 6.55% expense ratio.


Dividends

QHFNX vs. QLFNX - Dividend Comparison

QHFNX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while QLFNX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.14%.


PositionTTM2025
QHFNX
AQR MS Fusion HV Fund Fund Class N
0.00%0.00%
QLFNX
AQR LSE Fusion Fund Class N
0.14%0.14%

Frequently Asked Questions


QHFNX and QLFNX have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QHFNX and QLFNX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer