QHFNX vs. QLEIX
QHFNX (AQR MS Fusion HV Fund Fund Class N) and QLEIX (AQR Long-Short Equity Fund) are both mutual funds - QHFNX is a Multistrategy fund actively managed by AQR, while QLEIX is a Long-Short fund actively managed by AQR Funds. Both are actively managed. Their correlation of 0.87 suggests significant overlap in exposure. QHFNX charges 6.94%/yr vs 1.30%/yr for QLEIX.
Performance
QHFNX vs. QLEIX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QHFNX achieves a -1.02% return, which is significantly higher than QLEIX's -1.80% return.
QHFNX
- 1D
- -2.66%
- 1M
- 0.09%
- YTD
- -1.02%
- 6M
- -1.76%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
QLEIX
- 1D
- -1.28%
- 1M
- -0.14%
- YTD
- -1.80%
- 6M
- -2.12%
- 1Y
- 13.28%
- 3Y*
- 25.25%
- 5Y*
- 22.99%
- 10Y*
- 12.12%
QHFNX vs. QLEIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
QHFNX AQR MS Fusion HV Fund Fund Class N | -1.02% | 4.97% |
QLEIX AQR Long-Short Equity Fund | -1.80% | 6.19% |
Correlation
The correlation between QHFNX and QLEIX is 0.87, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 6, 2025 | 0.87 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QHFNX vs. QLEIX — Risk / Return Rank
QHFNX
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
QLEIX
QHFNX vs. QLEIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AQR MS Fusion HV Fund Fund Class N (QHFNX) and AQR Long-Short Equity Fund (QLEIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| QHFNX | QLEIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.34 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 2.34 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 7.25 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
QHFNX vs. QLEIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QHFNX drawdown since its inception was -13.87%, smaller than the maximum QLEIX drawdown of -38.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QHFNX and QLEIX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QHFNX | QLEIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -13.87% | -38.11% | +24.24% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -6.01% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -7.07% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -17.07% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -38.11% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.65% | -2.40% | -2.25% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.86% | -7.70% | +2.84% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 1.94% | — |
Volatility
QHFNX vs. QLEIX - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QHFNX | QLEIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 3.12% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 5.88% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.18% | 7.48% | +9.70% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.18% | 10.04% | +7.14% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.18% | 10.56% | +6.62% |
QHFNX vs. QLEIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
QHFNX has a 6.94% expense ratio, which is higher than QLEIX's 1.30% expense ratio.
Dividends
QHFNX vs. QLEIX - Dividend Comparison
QHFNX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while QLEIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.78%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QHFNX AQR MS Fusion HV Fund Fund Class N | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
QLEIX AQR Long-Short Equity Fund | 1.78% | 1.75% | 7.12% | 20.88% | 14.15% | 0.00% | 1.57% | 0.00% | 6.03% | 9.11% | 3.01% | 4.98% |
Frequently Asked Questions
QHFNX and QLEIX have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for QHFNX and QLEIX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer