QGRPX vs. PCEMX
Compare and contrast key facts about UBS US Quality Growth At Reasonable Price Fund (QGRPX) and PACE International Emerging Markets Equity Investments (PCEMX).
QGRPX is managed by UBS. It was launched on Jul 8, 2020. PCEMX is managed by UBS. It was launched on Aug 23, 1995.
Performance
QGRPX vs. PCEMX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
QGRPX vs. PCEMX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QGRPX UBS US Quality Growth At Reasonable Price Fund | -11.21% | 15.51% | 25.13% | 35.52% | -25.57% | 29.14% | 14.62% |
PCEMX PACE International Emerging Markets Equity Investments | 3.14% | 36.75% | 4.15% | 10.33% | -18.97% | -1.79% | 23.56% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QGRPX achieves a -11.21% return, which is significantly lower than PCEMX's 3.14% return.
QGRPX
- 1D
- 3.61%
- 1M
- -5.51%
- YTD
- -11.21%
- 6M
- -10.79%
- 1Y
- 9.83%
- 3Y*
- 16.82%
- 5Y*
- 9.75%
- 10Y*
- —
PCEMX
- 1D
- 2.90%
- 1M
- -10.44%
- YTD
- 3.14%
- 6M
- 7.40%
- 1Y
- 35.40%
- 3Y*
- 15.28%
- 5Y*
- 4.25%
- 10Y*
- 7.80%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
QGRPX vs. PCEMX - Expense Ratio Comparison
QGRPX has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than PCEMX's 1.20% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
QGRPX vs. PCEMX — Risk / Return Rank
QGRPX
PCEMX
QGRPX vs. PCEMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for UBS US Quality Growth At Reasonable Price Fund (QGRPX) and PACE International Emerging Markets Equity Investments (PCEMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| QGRPX | PCEMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.54 | 2.14 | -1.60 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.95 | 2.67 | -1.72 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.13 | 1.42 | -0.29 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.21 | 2.32 | -2.12 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.68 | 8.71 | -8.04 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| QGRPX | PCEMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.54 | 2.14 | -1.60 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.51 | 0.25 | +0.25 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.46 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.63 | 0.24 | +0.39 |
Correlation
The correlation between QGRPX and PCEMX is 0.49, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
QGRPX vs. PCEMX - Dividend Comparison
QGRPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.94%, more than PCEMX's 4.76% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QGRPX UBS US Quality Growth At Reasonable Price Fund | 6.94% | 6.16% | 3.62% | 0.42% | 1.00% | 2.84% | 0.37% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PCEMX PACE International Emerging Markets Equity Investments | 4.76% | 4.91% | 1.22% | 1.44% | 2.52% | 11.70% | 1.10% | 1.04% | 1.84% | 1.16% | 1.09% | 1.09% |
Drawdowns
QGRPX vs. PCEMX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QGRPX drawdown since its inception was -30.28%, smaller than the maximum PCEMX drawdown of -65.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QGRPX and PCEMX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| QGRPX | PCEMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -30.28% | -65.32% | +35.04% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.45% | -14.42% | -3.03% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -30.28% | -36.66% | +6.38% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -39.17% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -14.47% | -11.94% | -2.53% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.65% | -20.98% | +13.33% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.30% | 3.89% | +1.41% |
Volatility
QGRPX vs. PCEMX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for UBS US Quality Growth At Reasonable Price Fund (QGRPX) is 6.13%, while PACE International Emerging Markets Equity Investments (PCEMX) has a volatility of 9.58%. This indicates that QGRPX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PCEMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| QGRPX | PCEMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.13% | 9.58% | -3.45% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.43% | 13.62% | -2.19% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.16% | 18.33% | +2.83% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.60% | 17.12% | +2.48% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.43% | 17.32% | +2.11% |