QGRO vs. NACP
QGRO (American Century STOXX U.S. Quality Growth ETF) and NACP (Impact Shares NAACP Minority Empowerment ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds - QGRO tracks the iSTOXX American Century USA Quality Growth (USD)(GR) while NACP tracks the Morningstar Minority Empowerment Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, QGRO returned 12.22%/yr vs 15.98%/yr for NACP. Their correlation of 0.84 suggests significant overlap in exposure. QGRO charges 0.29%/yr vs 0.49%/yr for NACP.
Performance
QGRO vs. NACP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QGRO achieves a 2.19% return, which is significantly lower than NACP's 22.18% return.
QGRO
- 1D
- -0.43%
- 1M
- 4.28%
- YTD
- 2.19%
- 6M
- 2.57%
- 1Y
- 10.81%
- 3Y*
- 21.29%
- 5Y*
- 12.22%
- 10Y*
- —
NACP
- 1D
- -0.13%
- 1M
- 9.92%
- YTD
- 22.18%
- 6M
- 20.98%
- 1Y
- 43.81%
- 3Y*
- 27.18%
- 5Y*
- 15.98%
- 10Y*
- —
QGRO vs. NACP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QGRO American Century STOXX U.S. Quality Growth ETF | 2.19% | 15.18% | 31.42% | 32.42% | -24.54% | 24.57% | 37.99% | 35.09% | -16.85% |
NACP Impact Shares NAACP Minority Empowerment ETF | 22.18% | 21.38% | 23.93% | 29.69% | -23.05% | 27.62% | 26.00% | 30.74% | -11.37% |
Correlation
The correlation between QGRO and NACP is 0.80, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.80 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.85 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.89 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 13, 2018 | 0.84 |
The correlation between QGRO and NACP has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.80 to 0.89 - a consistent structural relationship.
QGRO vs. NACP - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
QGRO
NACP
Technology
Industrials
Healthcare
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Financial Services
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Technology
QGRO
NACP
Industrials
QGRO
NACP
Healthcare
QGRO
NACP
Consumer Cyclical
QGRO
NACP
Communication Services
QGRO
NACP
Financial Services
QGRO
NACP
Consumer Defensive
QGRO
NACP
Energy
QGRO
NACP
Utilities
QGRO
NACP
Real Estate
QGRO
NACP
Basic Materials
QGRO
NACP
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QGRO vs. NACP — Risk / Return Rank
QGRO
NACP
QGRO vs. NACP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American Century STOXX U.S. Quality Growth ETF (QGRO) and Impact Shares NAACP Minority Empowerment ETF (NACP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| QGRO | NACP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.43 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.09 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.13 | 1.54 | -0.41 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.80 | 4.56 | -3.76 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.69 | 20.04 | -17.35 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| QGRO | NACP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.71 | 3.14 | -2.43 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.58 | 0.92 | -0.34 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.67 | 0.93 | -0.26 |
Drawdowns
QGRO vs. NACP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QGRO drawdown since its inception was -32.56%, which is greater than NACP's maximum drawdown of -30.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QGRO and NACP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QGRO | NACP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -32.56% | -30.96% | -1.60% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.54% | -9.65% | -3.89% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -23.82% | -19.66% | -4.16% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -31.86% | -27.89% | -3.97% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.67% | -0.13% | -0.54% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.68% | -5.75% | -1.93% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.03% | 2.19% | +1.84% |
Volatility
QGRO vs. NACP - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for American Century STOXX U.S. Quality Growth ETF (QGRO) is 3.38%, while Impact Shares NAACP Minority Empowerment ETF (NACP) has a volatility of 4.44%. This indicates that QGRO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NACP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QGRO | NACP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.38% | 4.44% | -1.06% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.71% | 11.13% | +0.58% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.33% | 14.02% | +1.31% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.06% | 17.47% | +3.59% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.93% | 18.70% | +4.23% |
QGRO vs. NACP - Expense Ratio Comparison
QGRO has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is lower than NACP's 0.49% expense ratio.
Dividends
QGRO vs. NACP - Dividend Comparison
QGRO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.19%, less than NACP's 0.55% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NACP Impact Shares NAACP Minority Empowerment ETF | 0.55% | 0.62% | 2.96% | 1.28% | 3.48% | 3.06% | 1.48% | 1.22% | 0.71% |
QGRO American Century STOXX U.S. Quality Growth ETF | 0.19% | 0.25% | 0.25% | 0.41% | 0.46% | 0.31% | 0.22% | 0.38% | 0.13% |
Frequently Asked Questions
QGRO and NACP have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
NACP has higher volatility (4.44%) compared to QGRO (3.38%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QGRO dropped -32.56% vs NACP's -30.96%.
On 5-year performance, NACP leads with 15.98% vs 12.22% for QGRO. On fees, QGRO is cheaper at 0.29% per year. On volatility, QGRO has been the lower-risk option at 3.38%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, NACP has performed better with a 15.98% return vs 12.22%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
QGRO is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for NACP.
NACP has the higher dividend yield at 0.55%, compared with 0.19% for QGRO.
QGRO tracks iSTOXX American Century USA Quality Growth (USD)(GR), while NACP tracks Morningstar Minority Empowerment Index. They also come from different issuers: American Century and Impact Shares. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for QGRO and 0.49% for NACP.
NACP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.14 vs 0.71), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for QGRO and NACP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer