QGRO vs. MID
QGRO (American Century STOXX U.S. Quality Growth ETF) and MID (American Century Mid Cap Growth Impact ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - QGRO is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the iSTOXX American Century USA Quality Growth (USD)(GR), while MID is a Mid Cap Growth Equities fund actively managed by American Century. QGRO is passively managed, while MID is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, QGRO returned 12.25%/yr vs 6.40%/yr for MID. Their correlation of 0.92 suggests significant overlap in exposure. QGRO charges 0.29%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for MID.
Performance
QGRO vs. MID - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QGRO achieves a 2.33% return, which is significantly lower than MID's 6.22% return.
QGRO
- 1D
- 0.14%
- 1M
- 3.95%
- YTD
- 2.33%
- 6M
- 2.50%
- 1Y
- 10.57%
- 3Y*
- 21.27%
- 5Y*
- 12.25%
- 10Y*
- —
MID
- 1D
- 0.71%
- 1M
- 4.09%
- YTD
- 6.22%
- 6M
- 2.98%
- 1Y
- 7.13%
- 3Y*
- 14.75%
- 5Y*
- 6.40%
- 10Y*
- —
QGRO vs. MID - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QGRO American Century STOXX U.S. Quality Growth ETF | 2.33% | 15.18% | 31.42% | 32.42% | -24.54% | 24.57% | 21.88% |
MID American Century Mid Cap Growth Impact ETF | 6.22% | 8.22% | 19.40% | 22.20% | -27.44% | 10.39% | 29.63% |
Correlation
The correlation between QGRO and MID is 0.87, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.87 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.89 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.92 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 16, 2020 | 0.92 |
The correlation between QGRO and MID has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.87 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.
QGRO vs. MID - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
QGRO
MID
Technology
Industrials
Healthcare
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
-
Financial Services
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
Real Estate
-
Basic Materials
Technology
QGRO
MID
Industrials
QGRO
MID
Healthcare
QGRO
MID
Consumer Cyclical
QGRO
MID
Communication Services
QGRO
MID
-
Financial Services
QGRO
MID
Consumer Defensive
QGRO
MID
Energy
QGRO
MID
Utilities
QGRO
MID
Real Estate
QGRO
MID
-
Basic Materials
QGRO
MID
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QGRO vs. MID — Risk / Return Rank
QGRO
MID
QGRO vs. MID - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American Century STOXX U.S. Quality Growth ETF (QGRO) and American Century Mid Cap Growth Impact ETF (MID). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| QGRO | MID | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.26 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.34 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.12 | 1.08 | +0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.78 | 0.52 | +0.27 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.63 | 1.53 | +1.09 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| QGRO | MID | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.69 | 0.43 | +0.26 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.58 | 0.27 | +0.31 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.67 | 0.41 | +0.25 |
Drawdowns
QGRO vs. MID - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QGRO drawdown since its inception was -32.56%, smaller than the maximum MID drawdown of -40.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QGRO and MID.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QGRO | MID | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -32.56% | -40.15% | +7.59% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.54% | -13.89% | +0.35% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -23.82% | -23.92% | +0.10% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -31.86% | -40.15% | +8.29% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.53% | 0.00% | -0.53% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.67% | -13.43% | +5.76% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.03% | 4.66% | -0.63% |
Volatility
QGRO vs. MID - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for American Century STOXX U.S. Quality Growth ETF (QGRO) is 3.37%, while American Century Mid Cap Growth Impact ETF (MID) has a volatility of 4.90%. This indicates that QGRO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MID based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QGRO | MID | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.37% | 4.90% | -1.53% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.70% | 13.02% | -1.32% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.32% | 16.69% | -1.37% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.05% | 23.62% | -2.57% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.92% | 23.91% | -0.99% |
QGRO vs. MID - Expense Ratio Comparison
QGRO has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is lower than MID's 0.45% expense ratio.
Dividends
QGRO vs. MID - Dividend Comparison
QGRO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.19%, more than MID's 0.15% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MID American Century Mid Cap Growth Impact ETF | 0.15% | 0.18% | 0.17% | 0.02% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
QGRO American Century STOXX U.S. Quality Growth ETF | 0.19% | 0.25% | 0.25% | 0.41% | 0.46% | 0.31% | 0.22% | 0.38% | 0.13% |
Frequently Asked Questions
QGRO and MID have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MID has higher volatility (4.90%) compared to QGRO (3.37%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QGRO dropped -32.56% vs MID's -40.15%.
On 5-year performance, QGRO leads with 12.25% vs 6.40% for MID. On fees, QGRO is cheaper at 0.29% per year. On volatility, QGRO has been the lower-risk option at 3.37%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, QGRO has performed better with a 12.25% return vs 6.40%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
QGRO is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for MID.
QGRO has the higher dividend yield at 0.19%, compared with 0.15% for MID.
QGRO is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while MID is Mid Cap Growth Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for QGRO and 0.45% for MID.
QGRO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.69 vs 0.43), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for QGRO and MID
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer