QGRD vs. XTR
QGRD (Horizon NASDAQ-100 Defined Risk ETF) and XTR (Global X S&P 500 Tail Risk ETF) are both Equity Hedged funds. QGRD is actively managed, while XTR is passively managed. Their correlation of 0.90 suggests significant overlap in exposure. QGRD charges 0.85%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for XTR.
Performance
QGRD vs. XTR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QGRD achieves a 10.11% return, which is significantly higher than XTR's 6.37% return.
QGRD
- 1D
- -3.94%
- 1M
- 1.47%
- YTD
- 10.11%
- 6M
- 7.90%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XTR
- 1D
- -2.51%
- 1M
- 0.50%
- YTD
- 6.37%
- 6M
- 5.98%
- 1Y
- 20.97%
- 3Y*
- 17.70%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
QGRD vs. XTR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
QGRD Horizon NASDAQ-100 Defined Risk ETF | 10.11% | 8.34% |
XTR Global X S&P 500 Tail Risk ETF | 6.37% | 8.27% |
Correlation
The correlation between QGRD and XTR is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 11, 2025 | 0.90 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QGRD vs. XTR — Risk / Return Rank
QGRD
XTR
QGRD vs. XTR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Horizon NASDAQ-100 Defined Risk ETF (QGRD) and Global X S&P 500 Tail Risk ETF (XTR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| QGRD | XTR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 1.91 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.59 | 0.68 | +0.91 |
Drawdowns
QGRD vs. XTR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QGRD drawdown since its inception was -9.41%, smaller than the maximum XTR drawdown of -20.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QGRD and XTR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QGRD | XTR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -9.41% | -20.83% | +11.42% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -8.51% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -14.35% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.45% | -2.74% | -1.71% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.19% | -5.94% | +3.75% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 2.00% | — |
Volatility
QGRD vs. XTR - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QGRD | XTR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 3.77% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 8.57% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.56% | 11.06% | +2.50% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.56% | 13.82% | -0.26% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.56% | 13.82% | -0.26% |
QGRD vs. XTR - Expense Ratio Comparison
QGRD has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than XTR's 0.25% expense ratio.
Dividends
QGRD vs. XTR - Dividend Comparison
QGRD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.42%, less than XTR's 16.75% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QGRD Horizon NASDAQ-100 Defined Risk ETF | 1.42% | 1.57% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XTR Global X S&P 500 Tail Risk ETF | 16.75% | 17.82% | 20.89% | 1.09% | 1.08% | 2.32% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.90, QGRD and XTR move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, XTR is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XTR is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for QGRD.
XTR has the higher dividend yield at 16.75%, compared with 1.42% for QGRD.
They also come from different issuers: Horizon and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for QGRD and 0.25% for XTR.
Find the right allocation for QGRD and XTR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer