PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QGRD vs. SFTX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

QGRD vs. SFTX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Horizon NASDAQ-100 Defined Risk ETF (QGRD) and Horizon International Managed Risk ETF (SFTX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QGRD achieves a 10.11% return, which is significantly lower than SFTX's 16.88% return.


QGRD

1D
-3.94%
1M
1.47%
YTD
10.11%
6M
7.90%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

SFTX

1D
-4.76%
1M
-2.44%
YTD
16.88%
6M
18.56%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QGRD vs. SFTX - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between QGRD and SFTX is 0.76, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 4, 2025

0.76

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QGRD vs. SFTX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Horizon NASDAQ-100 Defined Risk ETF (QGRD) and Horizon International Managed Risk ETF (SFTX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

QGRD vs. SFTX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


QGRDSFTXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.59

1.82

-0.23

Drawdowns

QGRD vs. SFTX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QGRD drawdown since its inception was -9.41%, smaller than the maximum SFTX drawdown of -12.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QGRD and SFTX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QGRDSFTXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-9.41%

-12.75%

+3.34%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.45%

-4.76%

+0.31%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.19%

-2.78%

+0.59%

Volatility

QGRD vs. SFTX - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QGRDSFTXDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.56%

22.59%

-9.03%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.56%

22.59%

-9.03%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.56%

22.59%

-9.03%

QGRD vs. SFTX - Expense Ratio Comparison

QGRD has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than SFTX's 0.82% expense ratio.


Dividends

QGRD vs. SFTX - Dividend Comparison

QGRD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.42%, more than SFTX's 0.21% yield.


Frequently Asked Questions


QGRD and SFTX have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, SFTX is cheaper at 0.82% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

SFTX is cheaper with a 0.82% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for QGRD.

QGRD has the higher dividend yield at 1.42%, compared with 0.21% for SFTX.

QGRD is categorized as Equity Hedged, while SFTX is Tactical Allocation. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for QGRD and 0.82% for SFTX.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QGRD and SFTX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer