QGRD vs. RFLR
QGRD (Horizon NASDAQ-100 Defined Risk ETF) and RFLR (Innovator U.S. Small Cap Managed Floor ETF) are both Equity Hedged funds. Both are actively managed. A 0.56 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. QGRD charges 0.85%/yr vs 0.89%/yr for RFLR.
Performance
QGRD vs. RFLR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QGRD achieves a 10.11% return, which is significantly higher than RFLR's 7.57% return.
QGRD
- 1D
- -3.94%
- 1M
- 1.47%
- YTD
- 10.11%
- 6M
- 7.90%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
RFLR
- 1D
- -1.86%
- 1M
- 0.10%
- YTD
- 7.57%
- 6M
- 7.78%
- 1Y
- 25.48%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
QGRD vs. RFLR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
QGRD Horizon NASDAQ-100 Defined Risk ETF | 10.11% | 8.34% |
RFLR Innovator U.S. Small Cap Managed Floor ETF | 7.57% | 10.22% |
Correlation
The correlation between QGRD and RFLR is 0.56, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 11, 2025 | 0.56 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QGRD vs. RFLR — Risk / Return Rank
QGRD
RFLR
QGRD vs. RFLR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Horizon NASDAQ-100 Defined Risk ETF (QGRD) and Innovator U.S. Small Cap Managed Floor ETF (RFLR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| QGRD | RFLR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 2.05 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.59 | 1.05 | +0.54 |
Drawdowns
QGRD vs. RFLR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QGRD drawdown since its inception was -9.41%, smaller than the maximum RFLR drawdown of -15.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QGRD and RFLR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QGRD | RFLR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -9.41% | -15.48% | +6.07% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -5.79% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.45% | -1.86% | -2.59% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.19% | -3.83% | +1.64% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 1.64% | — |
Volatility
QGRD vs. RFLR - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QGRD | RFLR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 4.27% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 8.64% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.56% | 12.46% | +1.10% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.56% | 12.30% | +1.26% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.56% | 12.30% | +1.26% |
QGRD vs. RFLR - Expense Ratio Comparison
QGRD has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is lower than RFLR's 0.89% expense ratio.
Dividends
QGRD vs. RFLR - Dividend Comparison
QGRD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.42%, more than RFLR's 0.62% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
QGRD Horizon NASDAQ-100 Defined Risk ETF | 1.42% | 1.57% | 0.00% |
RFLR Innovator U.S. Small Cap Managed Floor ETF | 0.62% | 0.67% | 0.26% |
Frequently Asked Questions
QGRD and RFLR have a correlation of 0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, QGRD is cheaper at 0.85% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
QGRD is cheaper with a 0.85% expense ratio, compared with 0.89% for RFLR.
QGRD has the higher dividend yield at 1.42%, compared with 0.62% for RFLR.
They also come from different issuers: Horizon and Innovator. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for QGRD and 0.89% for RFLR.
Find the right allocation for QGRD and RFLR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer