QFRD vs. SRVR
QFRD (Pacer S&P 500 Quality FCF R&D Leaders ETF) and SRVR (Pacer Data & Infrastructure Real Estate ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - QFRD is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the S&P 500 Quality FCF R&D Leaders Index, while SRVR is a REIT fund tracking the FTSE Nareit All Equity REITs Index. Both are passively managed. At a 0.38 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. Both charge a 0.49% expense ratio.
Performance
QFRD vs. SRVR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
QFRD
- 1D
- -0.53%
- 1M
- 3.98%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SRVR
- 1D
- 1.06%
- 1M
- -6.24%
- 6M
- 7.11%
- YTD
- 10.78%
- 1Y
- 1.42%
- 3Y*
- 4.89%
- 5Y*
- -2.96%
- 10Y*
- —
QFRD vs. SRVR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
QFRD Pacer S&P 500 Quality FCF R&D Leaders ETF | 14.34% |
SRVR Pacer Data & Infrastructure Real Estate ETF | 6.09% |
Correlation
The correlation between QFRD and SRVR is 0.38, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 13, 2026 | 0.38 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QFRD vs. SRVR — Risk / Return Rank
QFRD
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
SRVR
QFRD vs. SRVR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer S&P 500 Quality FCF R&D Leaders ETF (QFRD) and Pacer Data & Infrastructure Real Estate ETF (SRVR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| QFRD | SRVR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.03 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 0.08 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 0.16 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
QFRD vs. SRVR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QFRD drawdown since its inception was -9.69%, smaller than the maximum SRVR drawdown of -40.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QFRD and SRVR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QFRD | SRVR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -9.69% | -40.99% | +31.30% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -14.78% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -18.34% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -40.99% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.81% | -18.88% | +16.07% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.34% | -15.26% | +11.92% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 7.35% | — |
Volatility
QFRD vs. SRVR - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QFRD | SRVR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 4.46% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 13.93% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.74% | 17.18% | +2.56% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.74% | 19.82% | -0.08% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.74% | 21.41% | -1.67% |
QFRD vs. SRVR - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both QFRD and SRVR have an expense ratio of 0.49%.
Dividends
QFRD vs. SRVR - Dividend Comparison
QFRD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.11%, less than SRVR's 2.76% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QFRD Pacer S&P 500 Quality FCF R&D Leaders ETF | 0.11% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SRVR Pacer Data & Infrastructure Real Estate ETF | 2.76% | 2.67% | 2.00% | 3.69% | 1.70% | 1.19% | 1.59% | 1.61% | 2.13% |
Frequently Asked Questions
QFRD and SRVR have a correlation of 0.38, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Both ETFs have the same 0.49% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
QFRD and SRVR have the same expense ratio: 0.49% per year.
SRVR has the higher dividend yield at 2.76%, compared with 0.11% for QFRD.
QFRD is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while SRVR is REIT. QFRD tracks S&P 500 Quality FCF R&D Leaders Index, while SRVR tracks FTSE Nareit All Equity REITs Index.
Find the right allocation for QFRD and SRVR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer