QFRD vs. SRVR
QFRD (Pacer S&P 500 Quality FCF R&D Leaders ETF) and SRVR (Pacer Data & Infrastructure Real Estate ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - QFRD is a Quality Factor fund tracking the S&P 500 Quality FCF R&D Leaders Index, while SRVR is a REIT fund tracking the FTSE Nareit All Equity REITs Index. Both are passively managed. Their 0.35 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. Both charge a 0.49% expense ratio.
Performance
QFRD vs. SRVR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
QFRD
- 1D
- 0.40%
- 1M
- 0.30%
- 6M
- 17.23%
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
SRVR
- 1D
- -1.06%
- 1M
- -0.84%
- 6M
- 1.06%
- YTD
- 8.80%
- 1Y
- 0.43%
- 3Y*
- 4.12%
- 5Y*
- -3.01%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 5.00%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $22.97K | $34.82K | $12.88K | |
| $1.88M | $2.23M | $2.66M |
QFRD vs. SRVR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
QFRD Pacer S&P 500 Quality FCF R&D Leaders ETF | 13.35% |
SRVR Pacer Data & Infrastructure Real Estate ETF | 4.20% |
Correlation
The correlation between QFRD and SRVR is 0.35, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 13, 2026 | 0.35 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QFRD vs. SRVR — Risk / Return Rank
QFRD
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
SRVR
QFRD vs. SRVR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer S&P 500 Quality FCF R&D Leaders ETF (QFRD) and Pacer Data & Infrastructure Real Estate ETF (SRVR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| QFRD | SRVR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.01 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | -0.02 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | -0.05 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
QFRD vs. SRVR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QFRD drawdown since its inception was -9.69%, smaller than the maximum SRVR drawdown of -40.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QFRD and SRVR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QFRD | SRVR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -9.69% | -40.99% | +31.30% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -15.01% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -18.34% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -40.99% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.65% | -20.33% | +16.68% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.45% | -15.30% | +11.85% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 6.18% | — |
Volatility
QFRD vs. SRVR - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QFRD | SRVR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 5.05% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 14.27% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.17% | 17.42% | +1.75% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.17% | 19.89% | -0.72% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.17% | 21.39% | -2.22% |
QFRD vs. SRVR - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both QFRD and SRVR have an expense ratio of 0.49%.
Dividends
QFRD vs. SRVR - Dividend Comparison
QFRD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.11%, less than SRVR's 2.81% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QFRD Pacer S&P 500 Quality FCF R&D Leaders ETF | 0.11% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SRVR Pacer Data & Infrastructure Real Estate ETF | 2.81% | 2.67% | 2.00% | 3.69% | 1.70% | 1.19% | 1.59% | 1.61% | 2.13% |
Frequently Asked Questions
QFRD and SRVR have a correlation of 0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Both ETFs have the same 0.49% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
QFRD and SRVR have the same expense ratio: 0.49% per year.
SRVR has the higher dividend yield at 2.81%, compared with 0.11% for QFRD.
QFRD is categorized as Quality Factor, while SRVR is REIT. QFRD tracks S&P 500 Quality FCF R&D Leaders Index, while SRVR tracks FTSE Nareit All Equity REITs Index.
Find the right allocation for QFRD and SRVR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer