QEW vs. SPHQ
QEW (Invesco QQQ Equal Weight ETF) and SPHQ (Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - QEW is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the Nasdaq-100 Equal Weighted Index, while SPHQ is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Quality Index. Both are passively managed. A 0.78 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. QEW charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for SPHQ.
Performance
QEW vs. SPHQ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
QEW
- 1D
- -2.01%
- 1M
- 1.99%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SPHQ
- 1D
- -2.93%
- 1M
- 2.94%
- YTD
- 16.54%
- 6M
- 15.11%
- 1Y
- 25.84%
- 3Y*
- 22.34%
- 5Y*
- 14.14%
- 10Y*
- 15.46%
QEW vs. SPHQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
QEW Invesco QQQ Equal Weight ETF | 17.75% |
SPHQ Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF | 13.42% |
Correlation
The correlation between QEW and SPHQ is 0.78, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 18, 2026 | 0.78 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QEW vs. SPHQ — Risk / Return Rank
QEW
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
SPHQ
QEW vs. SPHQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco QQQ Equal Weight ETF (QEW) and Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF (SPHQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| QEW | SPHQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.34 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 2.92 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 12.48 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
QEW vs. SPHQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QEW drawdown since its inception was -5.87%, smaller than the maximum SPHQ drawdown of -57.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QEW and SPHQ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QEW | SPHQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -5.87% | -57.83% | +51.96% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -8.90% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -16.57% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -25.04% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -31.60% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.04% | -2.93% | -0.11% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.11% | -10.68% | +9.57% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 2.07% | — |
Volatility
QEW vs. SPHQ - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QEW | SPHQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 5.88% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 11.30% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.39% | 13.46% | +6.93% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.39% | 16.59% | +3.80% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.39% | 17.91% | +2.48% |
QEW vs. SPHQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
QEW has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than SPHQ's 0.15% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
QEW vs. SPHQ - Dividend Comparison
QEW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.11%, less than SPHQ's 1.07% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QEW Invesco QQQ Equal Weight ETF | 0.11% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SPHQ Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF | 1.07% | 1.09% | 1.15% | 1.42% | 1.85% | 1.19% | 1.55% | 1.51% | 1.85% | 1.57% | 1.67% | 2.29% |
Frequently Asked Questions
QEW and SPHQ have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SPHQ is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SPHQ is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for QEW.
SPHQ has the higher dividend yield at 1.07%, compared with 0.11% for QEW.
QEW is categorized as Nasdaq-100, while SPHQ is S&P 500. QEW tracks Nasdaq-100 Equal Weighted Index, while SPHQ tracks S&P 500 Quality Index. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for QEW and 0.15% for SPHQ.
Find the right allocation for QEW and SPHQ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer