QEW vs. QQQH
QEW (Invesco QQQ Equal Weight ETF) and QQQH (NEOS Nasdaq-100 Hedged Equity Income ETF) are both Nasdaq-100 funds. Their correlation of 0.87 suggests significant overlap in exposure. QEW charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.68%/yr for QQQH.
Performance
QEW vs. QQQH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
QEW
- 1D
- -0.11%
- 1M
- 10.55%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
QQQH
- 1D
- -0.20%
- 1M
- 4.22%
- YTD
- 7.69%
- 6M
- 7.76%
- 1Y
- 19.77%
- 3Y*
- 20.51%
- 5Y*
- 9.37%
- 10Y*
- —
QEW vs. QQQH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
QEW Invesco QQQ Equal Weight ETF | 21.49% |
QQQH NEOS Nasdaq-100 Hedged Equity Income ETF | 9.33% |
Correlation
The correlation between QEW and QQQH is 0.87, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 19, 2026 | 0.87 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QEW vs. QQQH — Risk / Return Rank
QEW
QQQH
QEW vs. QQQH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco QQQ Equal Weight ETF (QEW) and NEOS Nasdaq-100 Hedged Equity Income ETF (QQQH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| QEW | QQQH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 2.05 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.71 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 9.75 | 0.78 | +8.96 |
Drawdowns
QEW vs. QQQH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QEW drawdown since its inception was -4.15%, smaller than the maximum QQQH drawdown of -31.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QEW and QQQH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QEW | QQQH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -4.15% | -31.24% | +27.09% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -6.96% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -15.18% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -31.24% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.11% | -0.22% | +0.11% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.57% | -8.27% | +7.70% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 1.60% | — |
Volatility
QEW vs. QQQH - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QEW | QQQH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 1.76% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 7.32% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.78% | 9.67% | +6.11% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.78% | 13.18% | +2.60% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.78% | 13.37% | +2.41% |
QEW vs. QQQH - Expense Ratio Comparison
QEW has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than QQQH's 0.68% expense ratio.
Dividends
QEW vs. QQQH - Dividend Comparison
QEW has not paid dividends to shareholders, while QQQH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.76%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QEW Invesco QQQ Equal Weight ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
QQQH NEOS Nasdaq-100 Hedged Equity Income ETF | 8.76% | 8.86% | 7.53% | 7.18% | 9.05% | 7.77% | 7.48% | 0.65% |
Frequently Asked Questions
QEW and QQQH have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, QEW is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
QEW is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.68% for QQQH.
QQQH has the higher dividend yield at 8.76%, compared with 0.00% for QEW.
They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Neos. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for QEW and 0.68% for QQQH.
Find the right allocation for QEW and QQQH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer