PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QEW vs. QBUF
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

QEW vs. QBUF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco QQQ Equal Weight ETF (QEW) and Innovator Nasdaq-100 10 Buffer ETF - Quarterly (QBUF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


QEW

1D
-0.11%
1M
10.55%
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

QBUF

1D
-0.01%
1M
0.84%
YTD
4.68%
6M
4.57%
1Y
11.93%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QEW vs. QBUF - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between QEW and QBUF is 0.68, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 19, 2026

0.68

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QEW vs. QBUF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QEW

QBUF
QBUF Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
QBUF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QBUF Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
QBUF Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
QBUF Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
QBUF Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QEW vs. QBUF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco QQQ Equal Weight ETF (QEW) and Innovator Nasdaq-100 10 Buffer ETF - Quarterly (QBUF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

QEW vs. QBUF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


QEWQBUFDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.28

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

9.75

1.36

+8.39

Drawdowns

QEW vs. QBUF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QEW drawdown since its inception was -4.15%, smaller than the maximum QBUF drawdown of -8.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QEW and QBUF.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QEWQBUFDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-4.15%

-8.84%

+4.69%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.31%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.11%

-0.01%

-0.10%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.57%

-0.82%

+0.25%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.67%

Volatility

QEW vs. QBUF - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QEWQBUFDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.23%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.88%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.78%

5.25%

+10.53%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.78%

8.47%

+7.31%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.78%

8.47%

+7.31%

QEW vs. QBUF - Expense Ratio Comparison

QEW has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than QBUF's 0.79% expense ratio.


Dividends

QEW vs. QBUF - Dividend Comparison

Neither QEW nor QBUF has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


QEW and QBUF have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, QEW is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

QEW is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for QBUF.

QEW and QBUF have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

QEW tracks Nasdaq-100 Equal Weighted Index, while QBUF tracks Invesco QQQ Trust. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Innovator. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for QEW and 0.79% for QBUF.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QEW and QBUF

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer