PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QEVOX vs. SMIDX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

QEVOX vs. SMIDX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Quantified Evolution Plus Fund (QEVOX) and SMI Dynamic Allocation Fund (SMIDX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QEVOX achieves a 52.24% return, which is significantly higher than SMIDX's 10.26% return.


QEVOX

1D
0.33%
1M
-5.85%
YTD
52.24%
6M
47.28%
1Y
72.24%
3Y*
24.22%
5Y*
9.64%
10Y*

SMIDX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.48%
YTD
10.26%
6M
8.81%
1Y
26.17%
3Y*
15.70%
5Y*
6.97%
10Y*
6.47%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QEVOX vs. SMIDX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
QEVOX
Quantified Evolution Plus Fund
52.24%8.67%14.79%1.22%-24.02%14.49%-1.82%-1.96%
SMIDX
SMI Dynamic Allocation Fund
10.26%22.50%12.76%8.39%-19.12%14.00%9.64%-0.45%

Correlation

The correlation between QEVOX and SMIDX is 0.52, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.52

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.65

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.55

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 27, 2019

0.59

The correlation between QEVOX and SMIDX shifts across timeframes, from 0.52 (1 year) to 0.65 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QEVOX vs. SMIDX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QEVOX
QEVOX Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
QEVOX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QEVOX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
QEVOX Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
QEVOX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
QEVOX Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank

SMIDX
SMIDX Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
SMIDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SMIDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
SMIDX Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
SMIDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
SMIDX Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QEVOX vs. SMIDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Quantified Evolution Plus Fund (QEVOX) and SMI Dynamic Allocation Fund (SMIDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


QEVOXSMIDXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.54

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.36

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.46

1.39

+0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.62

3.08

+0.54

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

16.00

12.09

+3.92

QEVOX vs. SMIDX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QEVOX Sharpe Ratio is 2.60, which is comparable to the SMIDX Sharpe Ratio of 2.06. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QEVOX and SMIDX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

QEVOX vs. SMIDX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QEVOX drawdown since its inception was -28.47%, which is greater than SMIDX's maximum drawdown of -21.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QEVOX and SMIDX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QEVOXSMIDXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-28.47%

-21.99%

-6.48%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-19.83%

-8.73%

-11.10%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.21%

-10.11%

-11.10%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.40%

-21.99%

-5.41%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-21.99%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-10.79%

-1.67%

-9.12%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.86%

-6.30%

-7.56%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.49%

2.22%

+2.27%

Volatility

QEVOX vs. SMIDX - Volatility Comparison

Quantified Evolution Plus Fund (QEVOX) has a higher volatility of 12.62% compared to SMI Dynamic Allocation Fund (SMIDX) at 5.50%. This indicates that QEVOX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SMIDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QEVOXSMIDXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

12.62%

5.50%

+7.12%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

24.74%

11.37%

+13.37%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

27.60%

13.05%

+14.55%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.59%

10.87%

+9.72%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.13%

10.31%

+11.82%

QEVOX vs. SMIDX - Expense Ratio Comparison

QEVOX has a 1.56% expense ratio, which is higher than SMIDX's 1.19% expense ratio.


Dividends

QEVOX vs. SMIDX - Dividend Comparison

QEVOX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 43.57%, more than SMIDX's 10.73% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
QEVOX
Quantified Evolution Plus Fund
43.57%66.34%10.32%24.53%0.07%13.55%2.29%0.15%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SMIDX
SMI Dynamic Allocation Fund
10.73%11.83%6.43%0.19%0.00%7.91%5.32%1.22%1.53%0.92%0.25%1.27%

Frequently Asked Questions


QEVOX and SMIDX have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

QEVOX has higher volatility (12.62%) compared to SMIDX (5.50%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QEVOX dropped -28.47% vs SMIDX's -21.99%.

QEVOX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.60 vs 2.06), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QEVOX and SMIDX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer