PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QEFA vs. FPXI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

QEFA vs. FPXI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR MSCI EAFE StrategicFactors ETF (QEFA) and First Trust International Equity Opportunities ETF (FPXI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QEFA achieves a 6.21% return, which is significantly lower than FPXI's 38.06% return. Over the past 10 years, QEFA has underperformed FPXI with an annualized return of 9.05%, while FPXI has yielded a comparatively higher 13.94% annualized return.


QEFA

1D
-0.89%
1M
-1.41%
YTD
6.21%
6M
5.79%
1Y
17.01%
3Y*
14.71%
5Y*
7.62%
10Y*
9.05%

FPXI

1D
-5.63%
1M
8.84%
YTD
38.06%
6M
35.72%
1Y
51.16%
3Y*
29.56%
5Y*
4.36%
10Y*
13.94%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QEFA vs. FPXI - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
QEFA
SPDR MSCI EAFE StrategicFactors ETF
6.21%29.25%2.27%17.40%-14.03%12.50%6.76%21.91%-10.39%24.03%
FPXI
First Trust International Equity Opportunities ETF
38.06%26.37%12.62%9.56%-31.83%-15.73%71.50%33.69%-13.07%39.32%

Correlation

The correlation between QEFA and FPXI is 0.63, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.63

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.66

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.72

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.69

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 7, 2014

0.65

The correlation between QEFA and FPXI has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.63 to 0.72 - a consistent structural relationship.

QEFA vs. FPXI - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
QEFA
FPXI

Financial Services

14.3%
4.2%

Healthcare

11.4%
10.9%

Technology

10.5%
37.3%

Industrials

9.1%
21.5%

Consumer Cyclical

6.2%
6.5%

Basic Materials

4.9%
13.2%

Energy

4.3%
2.1%

Consumer Defensive

4.2%
0.7%

Communication Services

3.2%
2.2%

Utilities

2.3%
1.0%

Real Estate

1.7%
0.5%

Financial Services

QEFA
14.3%
FPXI
4.2%

Healthcare

QEFA
11.4%
FPXI
10.9%

Technology

QEFA
10.5%
FPXI
37.3%

Industrials

QEFA
9.1%
FPXI
21.5%

Consumer Cyclical

QEFA
6.2%
FPXI
6.5%

Basic Materials

QEFA
4.9%
FPXI
13.2%

Energy

QEFA
4.3%
FPXI
2.1%

Consumer Defensive

QEFA
4.2%
FPXI
0.7%

Communication Services

QEFA
3.2%
FPXI
2.2%

Utilities

QEFA
2.3%
FPXI
1.0%

Real Estate

QEFA
1.7%
FPXI
0.5%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QEFA vs. FPXI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QEFA
QEFA Risk / Return Rank: 3838
Overall Rank
QEFA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QEFA Sortino Ratio Rank: 3939
Sortino Ratio Rank
QEFA Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
QEFA Calmar Ratio Rank: 3737
Calmar Ratio Rank
QEFA Martin Ratio Rank: 4141
Martin Ratio Rank

FPXI
FPXI Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
FPXI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FPXI Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
FPXI Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
FPXI Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
FPXI Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QEFA vs. FPXI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR MSCI EAFE StrategicFactors ETF (QEFA) and First Trust International Equity Opportunities ETF (FPXI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


QEFAFPXIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.62

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.70

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.33

-0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.78

3.48

-1.70

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.30

11.66

-5.36

QEFA vs. FPXI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QEFA Sharpe Ratio is 1.32, which is lower than the FPXI Sharpe Ratio of 1.93. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QEFA and FPXI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

QEFA vs. FPXI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QEFA drawdown since its inception was -31.71%, smaller than the maximum FPXI drawdown of -55.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QEFA and FPXI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QEFAFPXIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-31.71%

-55.78%

+24.07%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.58%

-14.77%

+5.19%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.23%

-20.58%

+8.35%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.09%

-50.75%

+22.66%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-31.71%

-55.78%

+24.07%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.46%

-5.63%

+2.17%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.07%

-20.17%

+14.10%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.71%

4.40%

-1.69%

Volatility

QEFA vs. FPXI - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for SPDR MSCI EAFE StrategicFactors ETF (QEFA) is 3.70%, while First Trust International Equity Opportunities ETF (FPXI) has a volatility of 13.69%. This indicates that QEFA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FPXI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QEFAFPXIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.70%

13.69%

-9.99%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.63%

23.40%

-12.77%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.99%

26.63%

-13.64%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.81%

22.33%

-7.52%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.87%

21.46%

-5.59%

QEFA vs. FPXI - Expense Ratio Comparison

QEFA has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is lower than FPXI's 0.70% expense ratio.


Dividends

QEFA vs. FPXI - Dividend Comparison

QEFA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.89%, more than FPXI's 0.58% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FPXI
First Trust International Equity Opportunities ETF
0.58%0.70%0.93%0.71%1.13%0.71%0.18%0.67%1.75%0.75%2.09%1.34%
QEFA
SPDR MSCI EAFE StrategicFactors ETF
2.89%3.13%3.17%2.79%3.02%2.37%1.82%2.95%3.22%2.33%2.01%2.94%

Frequently Asked Questions


QEFA and FPXI have a correlation of 0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FPXI has higher volatility (13.69%) compared to QEFA (3.70%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QEFA dropped -31.71% vs FPXI's -55.78%.

On 10-year performance, FPXI leads with 13.94% vs 9.05% for QEFA. On fees, QEFA is cheaper at 0.30% per year. On volatility, QEFA has been the lower-risk option at 3.70%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, FPXI has performed better with a 13.94% return vs 9.05%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

QEFA is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.70% for FPXI.

QEFA has the higher dividend yield at 2.89%, compared with 0.58% for FPXI.

QEFA tracks MSCI EAFE Factor Mix A-Series (USD), while FPXI tracks IPOX International Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for QEFA and 0.70% for FPXI.

FPXI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.93 vs 1.32), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QEFA and FPXI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer