PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QDX.TO vs. TPE.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

QDX.TO vs. TPE.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Mackenzie International Equity Index ETF (QDX.TO) and TD International Equity Index ETF (TPE.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with QDX.TO having a 14.10% return and TPE.TO slightly higher at 14.19%.


QDX.TO

1D
-0.49%
1M
-1.06%
6M
8.38%
YTD
14.10%
1Y
26.93%
3Y*
18.42%
5Y*
11.47%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
8.89%

TPE.TO

1D
-0.48%
1M
-0.13%
6M
8.36%
YTD
14.19%
1Y
27.21%
3Y*
18.40%
5Y*
11.72%
10Y*
10.26%
ALL TIME*
9.90%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
CA$357.51KCA$296.06KCA$600.37K
CA$795.43KCA$1.07MCA$1.19M

QDX.TO vs. TPE.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
QDX.TO
Mackenzie International Equity Index ETF
14.10%25.29%12.93%13.65%-8.61%11.24%5.06%15.27%-8.78%
TPE.TO
TD International Equity Index ETF
14.19%25.30%12.36%15.65%-9.18%10.41%6.19%16.38%-8.54%

Correlation

The correlation between QDX.TO and TPE.TO is 0.94, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.94

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.87

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.78

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 2, 2018

0.64

Over the past year, QDX.TO and TPE.TO have become more correlated (0.94) than their long-term average of 0.64, meaning their price movements have been converging.

QDX.TO vs. TPE.TO - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
QDX.TO
TPE.TO

Financial Services

24.6%
24.8%

Industrials

19.0%
18.5%

Technology

12.4%
10.8%

Healthcare

10.4%
9.9%

Consumer Cyclical

7.7%
5.6%

Consumer Defensive

6.7%
4.4%

Basic Materials

5.8%
5.9%

Communication Services

4.3%
3.5%

Utilities

3.7%
3.1%

Energy

3.4%
2.6%

Real Estate

2.0%
1.7%

Financial Services

QDX.TO
24.6%
TPE.TO
24.8%

Industrials

QDX.TO
19.0%
TPE.TO
18.5%

Technology

QDX.TO
12.4%
TPE.TO
10.8%

Healthcare

QDX.TO
10.4%
TPE.TO
9.9%

Consumer Cyclical

QDX.TO
7.7%
TPE.TO
5.6%

Consumer Defensive

QDX.TO
6.7%
TPE.TO
4.4%

Basic Materials

QDX.TO
5.8%
TPE.TO
5.9%

Communication Services

QDX.TO
4.3%
TPE.TO
3.5%

Utilities

QDX.TO
3.7%
TPE.TO
3.1%

Energy

QDX.TO
3.4%
TPE.TO
2.6%

Real Estate

QDX.TO
2.0%
TPE.TO
1.7%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QDX.TO vs. TPE.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

QDX.TO
QDX.TO Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
QDX.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QDX.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
QDX.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
QDX.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
QDX.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank

TPE.TO
TPE.TO Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
TPE.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TPE.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
TPE.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
TPE.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
TPE.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

QDX.TO vs. TPE.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Mackenzie International Equity Index ETF (QDX.TO) and TD International Equity Index ETF (TPE.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


QDX.TOTPE.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.06

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.09

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

1.32

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.42

2.33

+0.09

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.28

8.71

+0.57

QDX.TO vs. TPE.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QDX.TO Sharpe Ratio is 1.77, which is comparable to the TPE.TO Sharpe Ratio of 1.71. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QDX.TO and TPE.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

QDX.TO vs. TPE.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QDX.TO drawdown since its inception was -28.08%, roughly equal to the maximum TPE.TO drawdown of -27.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QDX.TO and TPE.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QDX.TOTPE.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-28.08%

-27.42%

-0.66%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.88%

-11.35%

+0.47%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.25%

-14.41%

+0.16%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.55%

-24.81%

+1.26%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-27.42%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.38%

-0.96%

-0.42%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.48%

-4.36%

-0.12%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.83%

3.03%

-0.20%

Volatility

QDX.TO vs. TPE.TO - Volatility Comparison

Mackenzie International Equity Index ETF (QDX.TO) and TD International Equity Index ETF (TPE.TO) have volatilities of 4.13% and 4.31%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QDX.TOTPE.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.13%

4.31%

-0.18%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.78%

13.50%

-0.72%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.89%

15.50%

-0.61%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.11%

14.18%

-0.07%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.45%

14.72%

+0.73%

QDX.TO vs. TPE.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

QDX.TO has a 0.17% expense ratio, which is lower than TPE.TO's 0.19% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

QDX.TO vs. TPE.TO - Dividend Comparison

QDX.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.34%, more than TPE.TO's 2.10% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
QDX.TO
Mackenzie International Equity Index ETF
2.34%2.51%2.48%2.61%2.73%2.25%1.91%2.76%3.03%0.00%0.00%
TPE.TO
TD International Equity Index ETF
2.10%2.30%2.37%2.66%2.89%2.41%2.42%2.60%2.93%2.35%2.21%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.94, QDX.TO and TPE.TO move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, QDX.TO is cheaper at 0.17% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

QDX.TO is cheaper with a 0.17% expense ratio, compared with 0.19% for TPE.TO.

QDX.TO tracks Solactive GBS Developed Markets ex North America Large & Mid Cap CAD Index, while TPE.TO tracks Solactive GBS Developed Markets ex North America Large & Mid Cap CAD Index (CA NTR). They also come from different issuers: Mackenzie and TD. Their fees differ too: 0.17% for QDX.TO and 0.19% for TPE.TO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QDX.TO and TPE.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer