QDX.TO vs. TPE.TO
QDX.TO (Mackenzie International Equity Index ETF) and TPE.TO (TD International Equity Index ETF) are both Foreign Large Cap Equities funds - QDX.TO tracks the Solactive GBS Developed Markets ex North America Large & Mid Cap CAD Index while TPE.TO tracks the Solactive GBS Developed Markets ex North America Large & Mid Cap CAD Index (CA NTR). Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, QDX.TO returned 11.47%/yr vs 11.72%/yr for TPE.TO. Their 0.64 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. QDX.TO charges 0.17%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for TPE.TO.
Performance
QDX.TO vs. TPE.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with QDX.TO having a 14.10% return and TPE.TO slightly higher at 14.19%.
QDX.TO
- 1D
- -0.49%
- 1M
- -1.06%
- 6M
- 8.38%
- YTD
- 14.10%
- 1Y
- 26.93%
- 3Y*
- 18.42%
- 5Y*
- 11.47%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 8.89%
TPE.TO
- 1D
- -0.48%
- 1M
- -0.13%
- 6M
- 8.36%
- YTD
- 14.19%
- 1Y
- 27.21%
- 3Y*
- 18.40%
- 5Y*
- 11.72%
- 10Y*
- 10.26%
- ALL TIME*
- 9.90%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| CA$357.51K | CA$296.06K | CA$600.37K | |
| CA$795.43K | CA$1.07M | CA$1.19M |
QDX.TO vs. TPE.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QDX.TO Mackenzie International Equity Index ETF | 14.10% | 25.29% | 12.93% | 13.65% | -8.61% | 11.24% | 5.06% | 15.27% | -8.78% |
TPE.TO TD International Equity Index ETF | 14.19% | 25.30% | 12.36% | 15.65% | -9.18% | 10.41% | 6.19% | 16.38% | -8.54% |
Correlation
The correlation between QDX.TO and TPE.TO is 0.94, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.94 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.87 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.78 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 2, 2018 | 0.64 |
Over the past year, QDX.TO and TPE.TO have become more correlated (0.94) than their long-term average of 0.64, meaning their price movements have been converging.
QDX.TO vs. TPE.TO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
QDX.TO
TPE.TO
Financial Services
Industrials
Technology
Healthcare
Consumer Cyclical
Consumer Defensive
Basic Materials
Communication Services
Utilities
Energy
Real Estate
Financial Services
QDX.TO
TPE.TO
Industrials
QDX.TO
TPE.TO
Technology
QDX.TO
TPE.TO
Healthcare
QDX.TO
TPE.TO
Consumer Cyclical
QDX.TO
TPE.TO
Consumer Defensive
QDX.TO
TPE.TO
Basic Materials
QDX.TO
TPE.TO
Communication Services
QDX.TO
TPE.TO
Utilities
QDX.TO
TPE.TO
Energy
QDX.TO
TPE.TO
Real Estate
QDX.TO
TPE.TO
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QDX.TO vs. TPE.TO — Risk / Return Rank
QDX.TO
TPE.TO
QDX.TO vs. TPE.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Mackenzie International Equity Index ETF (QDX.TO) and TD International Equity Index ETF (TPE.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| QDX.TO | TPE.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.06 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.09 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.32 | 1.32 | 0.00 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.42 | 2.33 | +0.09 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.28 | 8.71 | +0.57 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
QDX.TO vs. TPE.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QDX.TO drawdown since its inception was -28.08%, roughly equal to the maximum TPE.TO drawdown of -27.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QDX.TO and TPE.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QDX.TO | TPE.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -28.08% | -27.42% | -0.66% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.88% | -11.35% | +0.47% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.25% | -14.41% | +0.16% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -23.55% | -24.81% | +1.26% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -27.42% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.38% | -0.96% | -0.42% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.48% | -4.36% | -0.12% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.83% | 3.03% | -0.20% |
Volatility
QDX.TO vs. TPE.TO - Volatility Comparison
Mackenzie International Equity Index ETF (QDX.TO) and TD International Equity Index ETF (TPE.TO) have volatilities of 4.13% and 4.31%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QDX.TO | TPE.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.13% | 4.31% | -0.18% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.78% | 13.50% | -0.72% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.89% | 15.50% | -0.61% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.11% | 14.18% | -0.07% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.45% | 14.72% | +0.73% |
QDX.TO vs. TPE.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
QDX.TO has a 0.17% expense ratio, which is lower than TPE.TO's 0.19% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
QDX.TO vs. TPE.TO - Dividend Comparison
QDX.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.34%, more than TPE.TO's 2.10% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QDX.TO Mackenzie International Equity Index ETF | 2.34% | 2.51% | 2.48% | 2.61% | 2.73% | 2.25% | 1.91% | 2.76% | 3.03% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TPE.TO TD International Equity Index ETF | 2.10% | 2.30% | 2.37% | 2.66% | 2.89% | 2.41% | 2.42% | 2.60% | 2.93% | 2.35% | 2.21% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.94, QDX.TO and TPE.TO move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, QDX.TO is cheaper at 0.17% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
QDX.TO is cheaper with a 0.17% expense ratio, compared with 0.19% for TPE.TO.
QDX.TO tracks Solactive GBS Developed Markets ex North America Large & Mid Cap CAD Index, while TPE.TO tracks Solactive GBS Developed Markets ex North America Large & Mid Cap CAD Index (CA NTR). They also come from different issuers: Mackenzie and TD. Their fees differ too: 0.17% for QDX.TO and 0.19% for TPE.TO.
Find the right allocation for QDX.TO and TPE.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer