PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QDX.TO vs. MEQT.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

QDX.TO vs. MEQT.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Mackenzie International Equity Index ETF (QDX.TO) and Mackenzie All-Equity Allocation ETF (MEQT.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QDX.TO achieves a 14.10% return, which is significantly higher than MEQT.TO's 12.84% return.


QDX.TO

1D
-0.49%
1M
-1.06%
6M
8.38%
YTD
14.10%
1Y
26.93%
3Y*
18.42%
5Y*
11.47%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
8.89%

MEQT.TO

1D
-0.35%
1M
-1.97%
6M
10.00%
YTD
12.84%
1Y
25.74%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
23.44%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
CA$180.94KCA$187.75KCA$184.59K
CA$357.51KCA$296.06KCA$600.37K

QDX.TO vs. MEQT.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
QDX.TO
Mackenzie International Equity Index ETF
14.10%25.29%12.93%2.48%
MEQT.TO
Mackenzie All-Equity Allocation ETF
12.84%21.31%25.87%2.36%

Correlation

The correlation between QDX.TO and MEQT.TO is 0.67, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.67

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 20, 2023

0.46

Over the past year, QDX.TO and MEQT.TO have become more correlated (0.67) than their long-term average of 0.46, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QDX.TO vs. MEQT.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

QDX.TO
QDX.TO Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
QDX.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QDX.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
QDX.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
QDX.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
QDX.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank

MEQT.TO
MEQT.TO Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
MEQT.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MEQT.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
MEQT.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
MEQT.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
MEQT.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

QDX.TO vs. MEQT.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Mackenzie International Equity Index ETF (QDX.TO) and Mackenzie All-Equity Allocation ETF (MEQT.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


QDX.TOMEQT.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.35

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.46

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

1.39

-0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.42

3.34

-0.92

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.28

13.47

-4.19

QDX.TO vs. MEQT.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QDX.TO Sharpe Ratio is 1.77, which is comparable to the MEQT.TO Sharpe Ratio of 2.11. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QDX.TO and MEQT.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

QDX.TO vs. MEQT.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QDX.TO drawdown since its inception was -28.08%, which is greater than MEQT.TO's maximum drawdown of -15.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QDX.TO and MEQT.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QDX.TOMEQT.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-28.08%

-15.14%

-12.94%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.88%

-7.68%

-3.20%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.25%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.55%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.38%

-2.25%

+0.87%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.48%

-1.30%

-3.18%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.83%

1.90%

+0.93%

Volatility

QDX.TO vs. MEQT.TO - Volatility Comparison

Mackenzie International Equity Index ETF (QDX.TO) has a higher volatility of 4.13% compared to Mackenzie All-Equity Allocation ETF (MEQT.TO) at 3.77%. This indicates that QDX.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MEQT.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QDX.TOMEQT.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.13%

3.77%

+0.36%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.78%

10.21%

+2.57%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.89%

12.14%

+2.75%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.11%

12.05%

+2.06%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.45%

12.05%

+3.40%

QDX.TO vs. MEQT.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both QDX.TO and MEQT.TO have an expense ratio of 0.17%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

QDX.TO vs. MEQT.TO - Dividend Comparison

QDX.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.34%, more than MEQT.TO's 1.47% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
MEQT.TO
Mackenzie All-Equity Allocation ETF
1.47%1.60%1.73%0.81%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
QDX.TO
Mackenzie International Equity Index ETF
2.34%2.51%2.48%2.61%2.73%2.25%1.91%2.76%3.03%

Frequently Asked Questions


QDX.TO and MEQT.TO have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Both ETFs have the same 0.17% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

QDX.TO and MEQT.TO have the same expense ratio: 0.17% per year.

QDX.TO is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while MEQT.TO is Global Equities.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QDX.TO and MEQT.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer