QDVY.DE vs. XGBE.DE
QDVY.DE (iShares USD Floating Rate Bond UCITS ETF) and XGBE.DE (Xtrackers EUR Corporate Green Bond UCITS ETF (Acc)) are both Corporate Bonds funds - QDVY.DE tracks the Bloomberg US Floating Rate Notes 1-5 while XGBE.DE tracks the Bloomberg MSCI EUR Corporate and Agency Green Bond Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, QDVY.DE returned 4.99%/yr vs -1.12%/yr for XGBE.DE. At a correlation of -0.15, they often move in opposite directions. QDVY.DE charges 0.10%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for XGBE.DE.
Performance
QDVY.DE vs. XGBE.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QDVY.DE achieves a 5.04% return, which is significantly higher than XGBE.DE's 0.32% return.
QDVY.DE
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 1.61%
- 6M
- 3.59%
- YTD
- 5.04%
- 1Y
- 5.96%
- 3Y*
- 4.93%
- 5Y*
- 4.99%
- 10Y*
- —
XGBE.DE
- 1D
- -0.07%
- 1M
- -0.50%
- 6M
- 0.04%
- YTD
- 0.32%
- 1Y
- 1.16%
- 3Y*
- 3.78%
- 5Y*
- -1.12%
- 10Y*
- —
QDVY.DE vs. XGBE.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QDVY.DE iShares USD Floating Rate Bond UCITS ETF | 5.04% | -6.57% | 12.71% | 2.90% | 7.46% | 5.52% |
XGBE.DE Xtrackers EUR Corporate Green Bond UCITS ETF (Acc) | 0.32% | 2.73% | 3.40% | 7.52% | -16.38% | -0.21% |
Correlation
The correlation between QDVY.DE and XGBE.DE is -0.26, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.26 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.16 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.15 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 24, 2021 | -0.15 |
The correlation between QDVY.DE and XGBE.DE shifts across timeframes, from -0.26 (1 year) to -0.15 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QDVY.DE vs. XGBE.DE — Risk / Return Rank
QDVY.DE
XGBE.DE
QDVY.DE vs. XGBE.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares USD Floating Rate Bond UCITS ETF (QDVY.DE) and Xtrackers EUR Corporate Green Bond UCITS ETF (Acc) (XGBE.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| QDVY.DE | XGBE.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.64 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.93 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.18 | 1.07 | +0.11 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.85 | 0.44 | +1.41 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.49 | 1.36 | +3.13 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
QDVY.DE vs. XGBE.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QDVY.DE drawdown since its inception was -19.19%, smaller than the maximum XGBE.DE drawdown of -20.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QDVY.DE and XGBE.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QDVY.DE | XGBE.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -19.19% | -20.20% | +1.01% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.21% | -2.62% | -0.59% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -11.29% | -2.62% | -8.67% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -11.29% | -20.20% | +8.91% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.24% | -6.22% | +1.98% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.34% | -10.28% | +2.94% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.32% | 0.85% | +0.47% |
Volatility
QDVY.DE vs. XGBE.DE - Volatility Comparison
iShares USD Floating Rate Bond UCITS ETF (QDVY.DE) has a higher volatility of 1.50% compared to Xtrackers EUR Corporate Green Bond UCITS ETF (Acc) (XGBE.DE) at 0.81%. This indicates that QDVY.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XGBE.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QDVY.DE | XGBE.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.50% | 0.81% | +0.69% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 4.35% | 2.74% | +1.61% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 6.07% | 3.27% | +2.80% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 7.84% | 5.05% | +2.79% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 9.01% | 5.02% | +3.99% |
QDVY.DE vs. XGBE.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
QDVY.DE has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than XGBE.DE's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
QDVY.DE vs. XGBE.DE - Dividend Comparison
QDVY.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.61%, while XGBE.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QDVY.DE iShares USD Floating Rate Bond UCITS ETF | 4.61% | 5.18% | 5.89% | 5.61% | 1.50% | 0.57% | 1.75% | 2.94% | 2.20% | 0.47% |
XGBE.DE Xtrackers EUR Corporate Green Bond UCITS ETF (Acc) | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
QDVY.DE and XGBE.DE have a correlation of -0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, QDVY.DE is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
QDVY.DE is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for XGBE.DE.
QDVY.DE tracks Bloomberg US Floating Rate Notes 1-5, while XGBE.DE tracks Bloomberg MSCI EUR Corporate and Agency Green Bond Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for QDVY.DE and 0.25% for XGBE.DE.
Find the right allocation for QDVY.DE and XGBE.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer