QDVX.DE vs. AMED.DE
QDVX.DE (iShares MSCI Europe Quality Dividend ESG UCITS ETF EUR (Dist)) and AMED.DE (Amundi MSCI EMU ESG Leaders Select UCITS ETF DR EUR (C)) are both Europe Equities funds - QDVX.DE tracks the MSCI Europe High Dividend Yield ESG Reduced Carbon Target Select while AMED.DE tracks the MSCI EMU ESG Leaders Select 5% Issuer Capped. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, QDVX.DE returned 10.16%/yr vs 10.41%/yr for AMED.DE. Their correlation of 0.87 suggests significant overlap in exposure. QDVX.DE charges 0.28%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for AMED.DE.
Performance
QDVX.DE vs. AMED.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QDVX.DE achieves a 4.78% return, which is significantly lower than AMED.DE's 16.87% return.
QDVX.DE
- 1D
- 0.51%
- 1M
- -0.32%
- YTD
- 4.78%
- 6M
- 6.26%
- 1Y
- 7.42%
- 3Y*
- 10.77%
- 5Y*
- 10.16%
- 10Y*
- —
AMED.DE
- 1D
- 0.51%
- 1M
- 5.71%
- YTD
- 16.87%
- 6M
- 18.51%
- 1Y
- 26.18%
- 3Y*
- 16.11%
- 5Y*
- 10.41%
- 10Y*
- 9.75%
QDVX.DE vs. AMED.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QDVX.DE iShares MSCI Europe Quality Dividend ESG UCITS ETF EUR (Dist) | 4.78% | 11.35% | 10.70% | 15.30% | 0.75% | 19.00% | -10.08% | 26.55% | -6.30% | 2.31% |
AMED.DE Amundi MSCI EMU ESG Leaders Select UCITS ETF DR EUR (C) | 16.87% | 20.15% | 5.95% | 16.68% | -10.71% | 20.90% | -1.35% | 27.22% | -12.98% | 3.32% |
Correlation
The correlation between QDVX.DE and AMED.DE is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.79 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.83 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.85 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 24, 2017 | 0.87 |
The correlation between QDVX.DE and AMED.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.79 to 0.87 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QDVX.DE vs. AMED.DE — Risk / Return Rank
QDVX.DE
AMED.DE
QDVX.DE vs. AMED.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Europe Quality Dividend ESG UCITS ETF EUR (Dist) (QDVX.DE) and Amundi MSCI EMU ESG Leaders Select UCITS ETF DR EUR (C) (AMED.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| QDVX.DE | AMED.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.04 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.55 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.13 | 1.33 | -0.20 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.94 | 2.49 | -1.56 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.94 | 9.40 | -6.47 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| QDVX.DE | AMED.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.69 | 1.74 | -1.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.79 | 0.65 | +0.14 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.57 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.51 | 0.47 | +0.04 |
Drawdowns
QDVX.DE vs. AMED.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QDVX.DE drawdown since its inception was -38.46%, roughly equal to the maximum AMED.DE drawdown of -38.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QDVX.DE and AMED.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QDVX.DE | AMED.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -38.46% | -38.35% | -0.11% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.24% | -10.56% | +2.32% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.02% | -14.07% | +0.05% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -14.59% | -24.06% | +9.47% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -38.35% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.25% | -0.17% | -2.08% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.70% | -6.69% | +1.99% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.63% | 2.81% | -0.18% |
Volatility
QDVX.DE vs. AMED.DE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares MSCI Europe Quality Dividend ESG UCITS ETF EUR (Dist) (QDVX.DE) is 3.58%, while Amundi MSCI EMU ESG Leaders Select UCITS ETF DR EUR (C) (AMED.DE) has a volatility of 5.61%. This indicates that QDVX.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AMED.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QDVX.DE | AMED.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.58% | 5.61% | -2.03% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.60% | 12.64% | -4.04% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.09% | 15.19% | -4.10% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.78% | 15.87% | -3.09% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.35% | 17.00% | -1.65% |
QDVX.DE vs. AMED.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
QDVX.DE has a 0.28% expense ratio, which is higher than AMED.DE's 0.25% expense ratio.
Dividends
QDVX.DE vs. AMED.DE - Dividend Comparison
QDVX.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.21%, while AMED.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AMED.DE Amundi MSCI EMU ESG Leaders Select UCITS ETF DR EUR (C) | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
QDVX.DE iShares MSCI Europe Quality Dividend ESG UCITS ETF EUR (Dist) | 3.21% | 3.02% | 3.11% | 3.58% | 4.25% | 4.50% | 3.25% | 4.45% | 5.19% | 1.56% |
Frequently Asked Questions
QDVX.DE and AMED.DE have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, AMED.DE is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
AMED.DE is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.28% for QDVX.DE.
QDVX.DE tracks MSCI Europe High Dividend Yield ESG Reduced Carbon Target Select, while AMED.DE tracks MSCI EMU ESG Leaders Select 5% Issuer Capped. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.28% for QDVX.DE and 0.25% for AMED.DE.
Find the right allocation for QDVX.DE and AMED.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer