QDVS.DE vs. XMME.DE
QDVS.DE (iShares MSCI EM SRI UCITS ETF) and XMME.DE (Xtrackers MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF 1C) are both Emerging Markets Equities funds - QDVS.DE tracks the MSCI Emerging Markets SRI Select Reduced Fossil Fuels while XMME.DE tracks the MSCI Emerging Markets. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, QDVS.DE returned 5.01%/yr vs 8.66%/yr for XMME.DE. Their correlation of 0.94 suggests significant overlap in exposure. QDVS.DE charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.18%/yr for XMME.DE.
Performance
QDVS.DE vs. XMME.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QDVS.DE achieves a 17.24% return, which is significantly lower than XMME.DE's 30.06% return.
QDVS.DE
- 1D
- -1.71%
- 1M
- 0.53%
- YTD
- 17.24%
- 6M
- 17.96%
- 1Y
- 35.67%
- 3Y*
- 14.20%
- 5Y*
- 5.01%
- 10Y*
- —
XMME.DE
- 1D
- -1.04%
- 1M
- 5.19%
- YTD
- 30.06%
- 6M
- 29.85%
- 1Y
- 50.91%
- 3Y*
- 21.36%
- 5Y*
- 8.66%
- 10Y*
- —
QDVS.DE vs. XMME.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QDVS.DE iShares MSCI EM SRI UCITS ETF | 17.24% | 16.78% | 11.26% | -2.12% | -12.39% | 6.97% | 6.67% | 19.37% | -6.54% | 6.42% |
XMME.DE Xtrackers MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF 1C | 30.06% | 18.69% | 13.82% | 5.89% | -15.00% | 4.75% | 6.57% | 21.91% | -11.16% | 7.23% |
Correlation
The correlation between QDVS.DE and XMME.DE is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.93 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.93 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 27, 2017 | 0.94 |
The correlation between QDVS.DE and XMME.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QDVS.DE vs. XMME.DE — Risk / Return Rank
QDVS.DE
XMME.DE
QDVS.DE vs. XMME.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI EM SRI UCITS ETF (QDVS.DE) and Xtrackers MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF 1C (XMME.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| QDVS.DE | XMME.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.90 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.03 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.38 | 1.55 | -0.17 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.50 | 4.98 | -1.48 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.67 | 18.04 | -5.38 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| QDVS.DE | XMME.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.11 | 3.00 | -0.90 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.29 | 0.51 | -0.22 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.40 | 0.45 | -0.04 |
Drawdowns
QDVS.DE vs. XMME.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QDVS.DE drawdown since its inception was -36.51%, which is greater than XMME.DE's maximum drawdown of -31.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QDVS.DE and XMME.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QDVS.DE | XMME.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -36.51% | -31.96% | -4.55% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.19% | -10.67% | +0.48% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.83% | -19.16% | -1.67% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.09% | -24.38% | -0.71% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.00% | -1.04% | -1.96% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.82% | -9.53% | +0.71% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.82% | 2.95% | -0.13% |
Volatility
QDVS.DE vs. XMME.DE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares MSCI EM SRI UCITS ETF (QDVS.DE) is 6.00%, while Xtrackers MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF 1C (XMME.DE) has a volatility of 7.48%. This indicates that QDVS.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XMME.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QDVS.DE | XMME.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.00% | 7.48% | -1.48% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.84% | 14.90% | -1.06% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.93% | 17.70% | -0.77% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.89% | 16.74% | +0.15% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.68% | 18.61% | +0.07% |
QDVS.DE vs. XMME.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
QDVS.DE has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than XMME.DE's 0.18% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
QDVS.DE vs. XMME.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither QDVS.DE nor XMME.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.93, QDVS.DE and XMME.DE move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, XMME.DE is cheaper at 0.18% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XMME.DE is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for QDVS.DE.
QDVS.DE tracks MSCI Emerging Markets SRI Select Reduced Fossil Fuels, while XMME.DE tracks MSCI Emerging Markets. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for QDVS.DE and 0.18% for XMME.DE.
Find the right allocation for QDVS.DE and XMME.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer