CEBL.DE vs. SWDA.L
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares MSCI EM Asia UCITS ETF (Acc) (CEBL.DE) and iShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (SWDA.L).
CEBL.DE and SWDA.L are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. CEBL.DE is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the MSCI Emerging Markets Asia. It was launched on Aug 6, 2010. SWDA.L is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the MSCI ACWI NR USD. It was launched on Sep 25, 2009. Both CEBL.DE and SWDA.L are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: CEBL.DE or SWDA.L.
Key characteristics
| CEBL.DE | SWDA.L | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 18.39% | 20.46% |
| 1Y Return | 20.35% | 26.45% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | -0.52% | 9.05% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | 4.95% | 12.70% |
| 10Y Return (Ann) | 6.22% | 12.47% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 1.33 | 2.54 |
| Sortino Ratio | 1.91 | 3.56 |
| Omega Ratio | 1.25 | 1.49 |
| Calmar Ratio | 0.74 | 4.21 |
| Martin Ratio | 6.79 | 18.59 |
| Ulcer Index | 3.03% | 1.38% |
| Daily Std Dev | 15.54% | 10.05% |
| Max Drawdown | -35.09% | -25.58% |
| Current Drawdown | -10.05% | 0.00% |
Correlation
The correlation between CEBL.DE and SWDA.L is 0.56, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
CEBL.DE vs. SWDA.L - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, CEBL.DE achieves a 18.39% return, which is significantly lower than SWDA.L's 20.46% return. Over the past 10 years, CEBL.DE has underperformed SWDA.L with an annualized return of 6.22%, while SWDA.L has yielded a comparatively higher 12.47% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
CEBL.DE vs. SWDA.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both CEBL.DE and SWDA.L have an expense ratio of 0.20%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
CEBL.DE vs. SWDA.L - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI EM Asia UCITS ETF (Acc) (CEBL.DE) and iShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (SWDA.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
CEBL.DE vs. SWDA.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither CEBL.DE nor SWDA.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CEBL.DE iShares MSCI EM Asia UCITS ETF (Acc) | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.69% | 1.86% |
SWDA.L iShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
CEBL.DE vs. SWDA.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CEBL.DE drawdown since its inception was -35.09%, which is greater than SWDA.L's maximum drawdown of -25.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CEBL.DE and SWDA.L. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
CEBL.DE vs. SWDA.L - Volatility Comparison
iShares MSCI EM Asia UCITS ETF (Acc) (CEBL.DE) has a higher volatility of 6.17% compared to iShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (SWDA.L) at 2.94%. This indicates that CEBL.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SWDA.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.