PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QDVO vs. IBID
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

QDVO vs. IBID - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Amplify CWP Growth & Income ETF (QDVO) and iShares iBonds Oct 2027 Term TIPS ETF (IBID). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QDVO achieves a 5.51% return, which is significantly higher than IBID's 1.94% return.


QDVO

1D
-1.31%
1M
-3.62%
YTD
5.51%
6M
4.58%
1Y
21.13%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

IBID

1D
-0.05%
1M
-0.25%
YTD
1.94%
6M
2.03%
1Y
3.92%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QDVO vs. IBID - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
QDVO
Amplify CWP Growth & Income ETF
5.51%20.16%9.76%
IBID
iShares iBonds Oct 2027 Term TIPS ETF
1.94%5.66%1.22%

Correlation

The correlation between QDVO and IBID is -0.17, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.17

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 22, 2024

-0.11

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QDVO vs. IBID — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QDVO
QDVO Risk / Return Rank: 4848
Overall Rank
QDVO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QDVO Sortino Ratio Rank: 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
QDVO Omega Ratio Rank: 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
QDVO Calmar Ratio Rank: 4343
Calmar Ratio Rank
QDVO Martin Ratio Rank: 4949
Martin Ratio Rank

IBID
IBID Risk / Return Rank: 9595
Overall Rank
IBID Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IBID Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
IBID Omega Ratio Rank: 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
IBID Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
IBID Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QDVO vs. IBID - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amplify CWP Growth & Income ETF (QDVO) and iShares iBonds Oct 2027 Term TIPS ETF (IBID). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


QDVOIBIDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.52

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.07

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.72

-0.42

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.08

7.20

-5.12

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.08

29.14

-21.06

QDVO vs. IBID - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QDVO Sharpe Ratio is 1.68, which is lower than the IBID Sharpe Ratio of 3.19. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QDVO and IBID, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

QDVO vs. IBID - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QDVO drawdown since its inception was -17.75%, which is greater than IBID's maximum drawdown of -1.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QDVO and IBID.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QDVOIBIDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-17.75%

-1.28%

-16.47%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.21%

-0.55%

-9.66%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.81%

-0.55%

-4.26%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.41%

-0.22%

-2.19%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.62%

0.13%

+2.49%

Volatility

QDVO vs. IBID - Volatility Comparison

Amplify CWP Growth & Income ETF (QDVO) has a higher volatility of 4.47% compared to iShares iBonds Oct 2027 Term TIPS ETF (IBID) at 0.35%. This indicates that QDVO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IBID based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QDVOIBIDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.47%

0.35%

+4.12%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.59%

0.86%

+8.73%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.69%

1.23%

+11.46%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.54%

2.24%

+15.30%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.54%

2.24%

+15.30%

QDVO vs. IBID - Expense Ratio Comparison

QDVO has a 0.56% expense ratio, which is higher than IBID's 0.10% expense ratio.


Dividends

QDVO vs. IBID - Dividend Comparison

QDVO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.53%, more than IBID's 3.68% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023
IBID
iShares iBonds Oct 2027 Term TIPS ETF
3.68%4.43%4.24%0.81%
QDVO
Amplify CWP Growth & Income ETF
10.53%9.92%2.79%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


QDVO and IBID have a correlation of -0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

QDVO has higher volatility (4.47%) compared to IBID (0.35%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QDVO dropped -17.75% vs IBID's -1.28%.

On 1-year performance, QDVO leads with 21.13% vs 3.92% for IBID. On fees, IBID is cheaper at 0.10% per year. On volatility, IBID has been the lower-risk option at 0.35%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, QDVO has performed better with a 21.13% return vs 3.92%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IBID is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.56% for QDVO.

QDVO has the higher dividend yield at 10.53%, compared with 3.68% for IBID.

QDVO is categorized as Derivative Income, while IBID is Inflation-Protected Bonds. They also come from different issuers: Amplify and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.56% for QDVO and 0.10% for IBID.

IBID currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.19 vs 1.68), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QDVO and IBID

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer