QDVO vs. FIYY
QDVO (Amplify CWP Growth & Income ETF) and FIYY (GraniteShares YieldBOOST 20Y+ Treasuries ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. Both are actively managed. At a 0.38 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. QDVO charges 0.56%/yr vs 1.07%/yr for FIYY.
Performance
QDVO vs. FIYY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
QDVO
- 1D
- 0.77%
- 1M
- 1.91%
- 6M
- 8.25%
- YTD
- 9.03%
- 1Y
- 20.47%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FIYY
- 1D
- 0.16%
- 1M
- -0.47%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
QDVO vs. FIYY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
QDVO Amplify CWP Growth & Income ETF | 3.72% |
FIYY GraniteShares YieldBOOST 20Y+ Treasuries ETF | -1.85% |
Correlation
The correlation between QDVO and FIYY is 0.38, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 5, 2026 | 0.38 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QDVO vs. FIYY — Risk / Return Rank
QDVO
FIYY
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
QDVO vs. FIYY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amplify CWP Growth & Income ETF (QDVO) and GraniteShares YieldBOOST 20Y+ Treasuries ETF (FIYY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| QDVO | FIYY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.28 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.01 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.52 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
QDVO vs. FIYY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QDVO drawdown since its inception was -17.75%, which is greater than FIYY's maximum drawdown of -2.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QDVO and FIYY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QDVO | FIYY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -17.75% | -2.51% | -15.24% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.21% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.64% | -1.97% | +0.33% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.43% | -1.48% | -0.95% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.73% | — | — |
Volatility
QDVO vs. FIYY - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QDVO | FIYY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.09% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.95% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.83% | 5.05% | +7.78% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.43% | 5.05% | +12.38% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.43% | 5.05% | +12.38% |
QDVO vs. FIYY - Expense Ratio Comparison
QDVO has a 0.56% expense ratio, which is lower than FIYY's 1.07% expense ratio.
Dividends
QDVO vs. FIYY - Dividend Comparison
QDVO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.42%, more than FIYY's 1.13% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
FIYY GraniteShares YieldBOOST 20Y+ Treasuries ETF | 1.13% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
QDVO Amplify CWP Growth & Income ETF | 10.42% | 9.92% | 2.79% |
Frequently Asked Questions
QDVO and FIYY have a correlation of 0.38, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, QDVO is cheaper at 0.56% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
QDVO is cheaper with a 0.56% expense ratio, compared with 1.07% for FIYY.
QDVO has the higher dividend yield at 10.42%, compared with 1.13% for FIYY.
They also come from different issuers: Amplify and GraniteShares. Their fees differ too: 0.56% for QDVO and 1.07% for FIYY.
Find the right allocation for QDVO and FIYY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer