QDVG.DE vs. PPH
QDVG.DE (iShares S&P 500 Health Care Sector UCITS ETF (Acc)) and PPH (VanEck Vectors Pharmaceutical ETF) are both Health & Biotech Equities funds - QDVG.DE tracks the S&P 500 Capped 35/20 Health Care while PPH tracks the MVIS US Listed Pharmaceutical 25 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, QDVG.DE returned 8.96%/yr vs 7.54%/yr for PPH. A 0.58 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. QDVG.DE charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.36%/yr for PPH.
Performance
QDVG.DE vs. PPH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
QDVG.DE is traded in EUR, while PPH is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the PPH values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QDVG.DE achieves a -1.02% return, which is significantly lower than PPH's 3.80% return. Over the past 10 years, QDVG.DE has outperformed PPH with an annualized return of 8.96%, while PPH has yielded a comparatively lower 7.54% annualized return.
QDVG.DE
- 1D
- 2.86%
- 1M
- 5.53%
- YTD
- -1.02%
- 6M
- -0.23%
- 1Y
- 13.09%
- 3Y*
- 3.69%
- 5Y*
- 6.75%
- 10Y*
- 8.96%
PPH
- 1D
- 3.27%
- 1M
- 3.04%
- YTD
- 3.80%
- 6M
- 6.64%
- 1Y
- 19.39%
- 3Y*
- 10.18%
- 5Y*
- 10.98%
- 10Y*
- 7.54%
QDVG.DE vs. PPH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QDVG.DE iShares S&P 500 Health Care Sector UCITS ETF (Acc) | -1.02% | 1.65% | 8.47% | -1.74% | 3.30% | 37.81% | 1.69% | 24.75% | 8.90% | 7.28% |
PPH VanEck Vectors Pharmaceutical ETF | 3.80% | 7.52% | 15.18% | 3.74% | 9.00% | 26.61% | -3.21% | 22.09% | -1.47% | 1.07% |
Correlation
The correlation between QDVG.DE and PPH is 0.71, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.71 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.56 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.55 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.57 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 3, 2015 | 0.58 |
The correlation between QDVG.DE and PPH shifts across timeframes, from 0.55 (5 years) to 0.71 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QDVG.DE vs. PPH — Risk / Return Rank
QDVG.DE
PPH
QDVG.DE vs. PPH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares S&P 500 Health Care Sector UCITS ETF (Acc) (QDVG.DE) and VanEck Vectors Pharmaceutical ETF (PPH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| QDVG.DE | PPH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.25 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.40 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.16 | 1.21 | -0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.21 | 1.94 | -0.73 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.96 | 4.48 | -1.52 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| QDVG.DE | PPH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.89 | 1.14 | -0.25 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.46 | 0.73 | -0.27 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.56 | 0.43 | +0.13 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.48 | 0.52 | -0.04 |
Drawdowns
QDVG.DE vs. PPH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QDVG.DE drawdown since its inception was -26.77%, smaller than the maximum PPH drawdown of -31.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QDVG.DE and PPH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QDVG.DE | PPH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -26.77% | -31.54% | +4.77% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.74% | -10.02% | -0.72% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -22.70% | -20.54% | -2.16% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.70% | -20.54% | -2.16% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -26.77% | -28.74% | +1.97% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.31% | -3.51% | -3.80% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.35% | -9.92% | +4.57% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.41% | 4.33% | +0.08% |
Volatility
QDVG.DE vs. PPH - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares S&P 500 Health Care Sector UCITS ETF (Acc) (QDVG.DE) is 5.24%, while VanEck Vectors Pharmaceutical ETF (PPH) has a volatility of 6.05%. This indicates that QDVG.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PPH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QDVG.DE | PPH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.24% | 6.05% | -0.81% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.23% | 11.95% | -1.72% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.70% | 17.07% | -2.37% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.48% | 15.19% | -0.71% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.77% | 17.45% | -1.68% |
QDVG.DE vs. PPH - Expense Ratio Comparison
QDVG.DE has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than PPH's 0.36% expense ratio.
Dividends
QDVG.DE vs. PPH - Dividend Comparison
QDVG.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while PPH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.05%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PPH VanEck Vectors Pharmaceutical ETF | 2.05% | 1.78% | 1.98% | 2.09% | 1.55% | 1.62% | 1.66% | 1.77% | 1.97% | 1.92% | 2.43% | 1.93% |
QDVG.DE iShares S&P 500 Health Care Sector UCITS ETF (Acc) | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
QDVG.DE and PPH have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, QDVG.DE is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
QDVG.DE is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.36% for PPH.
QDVG.DE tracks S&P 500 Capped 35/20 Health Care, while PPH tracks MVIS US Listed Pharmaceutical 25 Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for QDVG.DE and 0.36% for PPH.
Find the right allocation for QDVG.DE and PPH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer