QDVG.DE vs. IS3N.DE
QDVG.DE (iShares S&P 500 Health Care Sector UCITS ETF (Acc)) and IS3N.DE (iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets IMI UCITS ETF (Acc)) are both exchange-traded funds - QDVG.DE is a Health & Biotech Equities fund tracking the S&P 500 Capped 35/20 Health Care, while IS3N.DE is a Emerging Markets Equities fund tracking the MSCI Emerging Markets Investable Market (IMI). Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, QDVG.DE returned 8.96%/yr vs 10.00%/yr for IS3N.DE. At a 0.39 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. QDVG.DE charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.18%/yr for IS3N.DE.
Performance
QDVG.DE vs. IS3N.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QDVG.DE achieves a -1.02% return, which is significantly lower than IS3N.DE's 25.82% return. Over the past 10 years, QDVG.DE has underperformed IS3N.DE with an annualized return of 8.96%, while IS3N.DE has yielded a comparatively higher 10.00% annualized return.
QDVG.DE
- 1D
- 2.86%
- 1M
- 5.53%
- YTD
- -1.02%
- 6M
- -0.23%
- 1Y
- 13.09%
- 3Y*
- 3.69%
- 5Y*
- 6.75%
- 10Y*
- 8.96%
IS3N.DE
- 1D
- -1.45%
- 1M
- 5.25%
- YTD
- 25.82%
- 6M
- 27.45%
- 1Y
- 46.76%
- 3Y*
- 19.99%
- 5Y*
- 8.61%
- 10Y*
- 10.00%
QDVG.DE vs. IS3N.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QDVG.DE iShares S&P 500 Health Care Sector UCITS ETF (Acc) | -1.02% | 1.65% | 8.47% | -1.74% | 3.30% | 37.81% | 1.69% | 24.75% | 8.90% | 7.28% |
IS3N.DE iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets IMI UCITS ETF (Acc) | 25.82% | 17.14% | 13.87% | 7.20% | -14.09% | 7.38% | 7.07% | 21.01% | -11.06% | 20.43% |
Correlation
The correlation between QDVG.DE and IS3N.DE is 0.12, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.12 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.16 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.21 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.37 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 3, 2015 | 0.39 |
Over the past year, the correlation between QDVG.DE and IS3N.DE has dropped to 0.12 - well below their long-term average of 0.39, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QDVG.DE vs. IS3N.DE — Risk / Return Rank
QDVG.DE
IS3N.DE
QDVG.DE vs. IS3N.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares S&P 500 Health Care Sector UCITS ETF (Acc) (QDVG.DE) and iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets IMI UCITS ETF (Acc) (IS3N.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| QDVG.DE | IS3N.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.80 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.18 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.16 | 1.49 | -0.33 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.21 | 4.42 | -3.21 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.96 | 16.00 | -13.04 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| QDVG.DE | IS3N.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.89 | 2.69 | -1.80 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.46 | 0.53 | -0.07 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.56 | 0.55 | +0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.48 | 0.44 | +0.05 |
Drawdowns
QDVG.DE vs. IS3N.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QDVG.DE drawdown since its inception was -26.77%, smaller than the maximum IS3N.DE drawdown of -35.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QDVG.DE and IS3N.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QDVG.DE | IS3N.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -26.77% | -35.06% | +8.29% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.74% | -10.52% | -0.22% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -22.70% | -19.17% | -3.53% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.70% | -22.01% | -0.69% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -26.77% | -32.51% | +5.74% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.31% | -2.49% | -4.82% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.35% | -9.30% | +3.95% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.41% | 2.91% | +1.50% |
Volatility
QDVG.DE vs. IS3N.DE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares S&P 500 Health Care Sector UCITS ETF (Acc) (QDVG.DE) is 5.24%, while iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets IMI UCITS ETF (Acc) (IS3N.DE) has a volatility of 7.16%. This indicates that QDVG.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IS3N.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QDVG.DE | IS3N.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.24% | 7.16% | -1.92% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.23% | 14.69% | -4.46% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.70% | 17.32% | -2.62% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.48% | 16.19% | -1.71% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.77% | 18.04% | -2.27% |
QDVG.DE vs. IS3N.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
QDVG.DE has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than IS3N.DE's 0.18% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
QDVG.DE vs. IS3N.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither QDVG.DE nor IS3N.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
QDVG.DE and IS3N.DE have a correlation of 0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, QDVG.DE is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
QDVG.DE is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.18% for IS3N.DE.
QDVG.DE is categorized as Health & Biotech Equities, while IS3N.DE is Emerging Markets Equities. QDVG.DE tracks S&P 500 Capped 35/20 Health Care, while IS3N.DE tracks MSCI Emerging Markets Investable Market (IMI). Their fees differ too: 0.15% for QDVG.DE and 0.18% for IS3N.DE.
Find the right allocation for QDVG.DE and IS3N.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer