QDVE.DE vs. EGLN.L
QDVE.DE (iShares S&P 500 Information Technology Sector UCITS ETF) and EGLN.L (iShares Physical Gold ETC) are both exchange-traded funds - QDVE.DE is a Technology Equities fund tracking the S&P 500 Capped 35/20 Information Technology Index, while EGLN.L is a Gold fund tracking the LBMA Gold Price. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, QDVE.DE returned 25.61%/yr vs 10.77%/yr for EGLN.L. At a correlation of -0.03, they often move in opposite directions. QDVE.DE charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for EGLN.L.
Performance
QDVE.DE vs. EGLN.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QDVE.DE achieves a 18.83% return, which is significantly higher than EGLN.L's -0.76% return. Over the past 10 years, QDVE.DE has outperformed EGLN.L with an annualized return of 25.61%, while EGLN.L has yielded a comparatively lower 10.77% annualized return.
QDVE.DE
- 1D
- 2.52%
- 1M
- -0.05%
- YTD
- 18.83%
- 6M
- 20.81%
- 1Y
- 43.45%
- 3Y*
- 28.42%
- 5Y*
- 23.77%
- 10Y*
- 25.61%
EGLN.L
- 1D
- 2.84%
- 1M
- -9.29%
- YTD
- -0.76%
- 6M
- -0.18%
- 1Y
- 22.86%
- 3Y*
- 26.28%
- 5Y*
- 18.47%
- 10Y*
- 10.77%
QDVE.DE vs. EGLN.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QDVE.DE iShares S&P 500 Information Technology Sector UCITS ETF | 18.83% | 10.01% | 46.09% | 54.17% | -25.82% | 46.74% | 29.67% | 53.89% | 3.09% | 20.90% |
EGLN.L iShares Physical Gold ETC | -0.76% | 46.01% | 34.32% | 9.37% | 6.00% | 3.85% | 13.68% | 20.59% | 3.38% | -0.47% |
Correlation
The correlation between QDVE.DE and EGLN.L is 0.13, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.13 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.06 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.01 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.00 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 2, 2015 | -0.03 |
The correlation between QDVE.DE and EGLN.L shifts across timeframes, from -0.03 (all time) to 0.13 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QDVE.DE vs. EGLN.L — Risk / Return Rank
QDVE.DE
EGLN.L
QDVE.DE vs. EGLN.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares S&P 500 Information Technology Sector UCITS ETF (QDVE.DE) and iShares Physical Gold ETC (EGLN.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| QDVE.DE | EGLN.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.01 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.22 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.33 | 1.21 | +0.13 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.71 | 1.10 | +1.61 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.03 | 3.36 | +3.67 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
QDVE.DE vs. EGLN.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QDVE.DE drawdown since its inception was -31.40%, smaller than the maximum EGLN.L drawdown of -47.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QDVE.DE and EGLN.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QDVE.DE | EGLN.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -31.40% | -47.44% | +16.04% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.60% | -21.94% | +6.34% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -29.81% | -21.94% | -7.87% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.81% | -21.94% | -7.87% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -31.40% | -26.21% | -5.19% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.15% | -19.73% | +12.58% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.80% | -22.54% | +16.74% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.03% | 7.17% | -1.14% |
Volatility
QDVE.DE vs. EGLN.L - Volatility Comparison
iShares S&P 500 Information Technology Sector UCITS ETF (QDVE.DE) has a higher volatility of 8.02% compared to iShares Physical Gold ETC (EGLN.L) at 6.72%. This indicates that QDVE.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EGLN.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QDVE.DE | EGLN.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.02% | 6.72% | +1.30% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.46% | 20.79% | -5.33% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.88% | 23.72% | -2.84% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.78% | 17.26% | +5.52% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.75% | 16.00% | +5.75% |
QDVE.DE vs. EGLN.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
QDVE.DE has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than EGLN.L's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
QDVE.DE vs. EGLN.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither QDVE.DE nor EGLN.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
QDVE.DE and EGLN.L have a correlation of 0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, QDVE.DE is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
QDVE.DE is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for EGLN.L.
QDVE.DE is categorized as Technology Equities, while EGLN.L is Gold. QDVE.DE tracks S&P 500 Capped 35/20 Information Technology Index, while EGLN.L tracks LBMA Gold Price. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for QDVE.DE and 0.25% for EGLN.L.
Find the right allocation for QDVE.DE and EGLN.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer