PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QDVD.DE vs. XDNE.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

QDVD.DE vs. XDNE.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in iShares MSCI USA Quality Dividend Advanced UCITS ETF (QDVD.DE) and Xtrackers MSCI Japan Screened UCITS ETF EUR Hedged (Acc) (XDNE.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QDVD.DE achieves a 16.81% return, which is significantly lower than XDNE.DE's 20.22% return. Over the past 10 years, QDVD.DE has underperformed XDNE.DE with an annualized return of 10.69%, while XDNE.DE has yielded a comparatively higher 13.77% annualized return.


QDVD.DE

1D
-0.26%
1M
0.51%
6M
14.53%
YTD
16.81%
1Y
26.15%
3Y*
17.23%
5Y*
12.61%
10Y*
10.69%

XDNE.DE

1D
-0.96%
1M
0.75%
6M
12.71%
YTD
20.22%
1Y
48.22%
3Y*
25.74%
5Y*
19.09%
10Y*
13.77%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QDVD.DE vs. XDNE.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
QDVD.DE
iShares MSCI USA Quality Dividend Advanced UCITS ETF
16.81%4.15%21.92%10.55%-1.08%32.39%-9.18%25.22%0.50%4.16%
XDNE.DE
Xtrackers MSCI Japan Screened UCITS ETF EUR Hedged (Acc)
20.22%25.99%21.86%32.65%-6.33%11.20%6.98%17.57%-17.40%19.33%

Correlation

The correlation between QDVD.DE and XDNE.DE is 0.53, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.53

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.47

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.51

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.55

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 31, 2015

0.56

The correlation between QDVD.DE and XDNE.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.47 to 0.56 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QDVD.DE vs. XDNE.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QDVD.DE
QDVD.DE Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
QDVD.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QDVD.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
QDVD.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
QDVD.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
QDVD.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank

XDNE.DE
XDNE.DE Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
XDNE.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XDNE.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
XDNE.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
XDNE.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
XDNE.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QDVD.DE vs. XDNE.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI USA Quality Dividend Advanced UCITS ETF (QDVD.DE) and Xtrackers MSCI Japan Screened UCITS ETF EUR Hedged (Acc) (XDNE.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


QDVD.DEXDNE.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.03

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.19

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.43

1.41

+0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.39

4.82

+0.57

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

18.98

16.26

+2.72

QDVD.DE vs. XDNE.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QDVD.DE Sharpe Ratio is 2.33, which is comparable to the XDNE.DE Sharpe Ratio of 2.30. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QDVD.DE and XDNE.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

QDVD.DE vs. XDNE.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QDVD.DE drawdown since its inception was -32.55%, smaller than the maximum XDNE.DE drawdown of -35.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QDVD.DE and XDNE.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QDVD.DEXDNE.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-32.55%

-35.20%

+2.65%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.83%

-9.96%

+5.13%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.55%

-21.73%

+0.18%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.55%

-21.73%

+0.18%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.55%

-35.20%

+2.65%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.56%

-3.20%

+1.64%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.63%

-8.27%

+3.64%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.37%

2.96%

-1.59%

Volatility

QDVD.DE vs. XDNE.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares MSCI USA Quality Dividend Advanced UCITS ETF (QDVD.DE) is 2.54%, while Xtrackers MSCI Japan Screened UCITS ETF EUR Hedged (Acc) (XDNE.DE) has a volatility of 6.99%. This indicates that QDVD.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XDNE.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QDVD.DEXDNE.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.54%

6.99%

-4.45%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.84%

16.52%

-8.68%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.20%

20.91%

-9.71%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.87%

18.70%

-4.83%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.79%

18.48%

-3.69%

QDVD.DE vs. XDNE.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

QDVD.DE has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than XDNE.DE's 0.25% expense ratio.


Dividends

QDVD.DE vs. XDNE.DE - Dividend Comparison

QDVD.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.48%, while XDNE.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
QDVD.DE
iShares MSCI USA Quality Dividend Advanced UCITS ETF
1.48%1.72%1.88%2.04%2.34%1.99%2.72%2.37%2.43%2.28%2.19%2.44%
XDNE.DE
Xtrackers MSCI Japan Screened UCITS ETF EUR Hedged (Acc)
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


QDVD.DE and XDNE.DE have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XDNE.DE is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XDNE.DE is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for QDVD.DE.

QDVD.DE is categorized as ESG, while XDNE.DE is Japan Equities. QDVD.DE tracks MSCI USA High Dividend Yield ESG Reduced Carbon Target Select Index, while XDNE.DE tracks MSCI Japan Select Screened Index (EUR Hedged). They also come from different issuers: iShares and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for QDVD.DE and 0.25% for XDNE.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QDVD.DE and XDNE.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer