PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XDNE.DE vs. TTPX.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XDNE.DE vs. TTPX.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Xtrackers MSCI Japan Screened UCITS ETF EUR Hedged (Acc) (XDNE.DE) and Amundi Japan Topix UCITS ETF Daily Hedged EUR (Acc) (TTPX.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XDNE.DE achieves a 21.20% return, which is significantly higher than TTPX.DE's 20.00% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with XDNE.DE having a 14.58% annualized return and TTPX.DE not far behind at 14.51%.


XDNE.DE

1D
1.85%
1M
2.84%
6M
20.84%
YTD
21.20%
1Y
47.69%
3Y*
25.07%
5Y*
19.01%
10Y*
14.58%

TTPX.DE

1D
1.01%
1M
2.45%
6M
19.74%
YTD
20.00%
1Y
46.17%
3Y*
25.47%
5Y*
19.18%
10Y*
14.51%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XDNE.DE vs. TTPX.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
XDNE.DE
Xtrackers MSCI Japan Screened UCITS ETF EUR Hedged (Acc)
21.20%25.99%21.86%32.65%-6.33%11.20%6.98%17.57%-17.40%19.33%
TTPX.DE
Amundi Japan Topix UCITS ETF Daily Hedged EUR (Acc)
20.00%27.49%21.75%32.48%-4.73%10.61%5.85%16.07%-17.94%20.25%

Correlation

The correlation between XDNE.DE and TTPX.DE is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.96

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.98

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.98

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.99

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 31, 2015

0.98

The correlation between XDNE.DE and TTPX.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.96 to 0.99 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XDNE.DE vs. TTPX.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XDNE.DE
XDNE.DE Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
XDNE.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XDNE.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
XDNE.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
XDNE.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
XDNE.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank

TTPX.DE
TTPX.DE Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
TTPX.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TTPX.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
TTPX.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
TTPX.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
TTPX.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XDNE.DE vs. TTPX.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI Japan Screened UCITS ETF EUR Hedged (Acc) (XDNE.DE) and Amundi Japan Topix UCITS ETF Daily Hedged EUR (Acc) (TTPX.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


XDNE.DETTPX.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.10

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.16

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.43

1.45

-0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.77

4.69

+0.08

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

16.39

16.30

+0.08

XDNE.DE vs. TTPX.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XDNE.DE Sharpe Ratio is 2.31, which is comparable to the TTPX.DE Sharpe Ratio of 2.41. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XDNE.DE and TTPX.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

XDNE.DE vs. TTPX.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XDNE.DE drawdown since its inception was -35.20%, roughly equal to the maximum TTPX.DE drawdown of -36.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XDNE.DE and TTPX.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XDNE.DETTPX.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.20%

-36.52%

+1.32%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.96%

-9.80%

-0.16%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.73%

-20.65%

-1.08%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.73%

-20.65%

-1.08%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.20%

-36.52%

+1.32%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.41%

-1.22%

-1.19%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.29%

-7.82%

-0.47%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.90%

2.82%

+0.08%

Volatility

XDNE.DE vs. TTPX.DE - Volatility Comparison

Xtrackers MSCI Japan Screened UCITS ETF EUR Hedged (Acc) (XDNE.DE) has a higher volatility of 7.30% compared to Amundi Japan Topix UCITS ETF Daily Hedged EUR (Acc) (TTPX.DE) at 5.68%. This indicates that XDNE.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TTPX.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XDNE.DETTPX.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.30%

5.68%

+1.62%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.31%

15.12%

+1.19%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.60%

19.07%

+1.53%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.69%

18.07%

+0.62%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.53%

18.20%

+0.33%

XDNE.DE vs. TTPX.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

XDNE.DE has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than TTPX.DE's 0.48% expense ratio.


Dividends

XDNE.DE vs. TTPX.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither XDNE.DE nor TTPX.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.96, XDNE.DE and TTPX.DE move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, XDNE.DE is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XDNE.DE is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.48% for TTPX.DE.

XDNE.DE tracks MSCI Japan Select Screened Index (EUR Hedged), while TTPX.DE tracks TOPIX Index (EUR Hedged). They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for XDNE.DE and 0.48% for TTPX.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XDNE.DE and TTPX.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer