XDNE.DE vs. XMK9.DE
XDNE.DE (Xtrackers MSCI Japan Screened UCITS ETF EUR Hedged (Acc)) and XMK9.DE (Xtrackers MSCI Japan UCITS ETF 4C EUR Hedged) are both Japan Equities funds from Xtrackers - XDNE.DE tracks the MSCI Japan Select Screened Index (EUR Hedged) while XMK9.DE tracks the MSCI Japan. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, XDNE.DE returned 13.77%/yr vs 14.18%/yr for XMK9.DE. With a 0.98 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. XDNE.DE charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for XMK9.DE.
Performance
XDNE.DE vs. XMK9.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with XDNE.DE having a 20.22% return and XMK9.DE slightly higher at 20.76%. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with XDNE.DE having a 13.77% annualized return and XMK9.DE not far ahead at 14.18%.
XDNE.DE
- 1D
- -0.96%
- 1M
- 0.75%
- 6M
- 12.71%
- YTD
- 20.22%
- 1Y
- 48.22%
- 3Y*
- 25.74%
- 5Y*
- 19.09%
- 10Y*
- 13.77%
XMK9.DE
- 1D
- -0.98%
- 1M
- 0.82%
- 6M
- 13.78%
- YTD
- 20.76%
- 1Y
- 49.69%
- 3Y*
- 26.71%
- 5Y*
- 19.70%
- 10Y*
- 14.18%
XDNE.DE vs. XMK9.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XDNE.DE Xtrackers MSCI Japan Screened UCITS ETF EUR Hedged (Acc) | 20.22% | 25.99% | 21.86% | 32.65% | -6.33% | 11.20% | 6.98% | 17.57% | -17.40% | 19.33% |
XMK9.DE Xtrackers MSCI Japan UCITS ETF 4C EUR Hedged | 20.76% | 27.06% | 22.48% | 33.32% | -6.06% | 11.96% | 7.38% | 17.43% | -16.83% | 18.73% |
Correlation
The correlation between XDNE.DE and XMK9.DE is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.96 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.98 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.98 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.99 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 31, 2015 | 0.98 |
The correlation between XDNE.DE and XMK9.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.96 to 0.99 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XDNE.DE vs. XMK9.DE — Risk / Return Rank
XDNE.DE
XMK9.DE
XDNE.DE vs. XMK9.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI Japan Screened UCITS ETF EUR Hedged (Acc) (XDNE.DE) and Xtrackers MSCI Japan UCITS ETF 4C EUR Hedged (XMK9.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| XDNE.DE | XMK9.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.10 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.14 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.41 | 1.43 | -0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.82 | 5.08 | -0.26 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 16.26 | 16.58 | -0.32 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
XDNE.DE vs. XMK9.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XDNE.DE drawdown since its inception was -35.20%, roughly equal to the maximum XMK9.DE drawdown of -34.30%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XDNE.DE and XMK9.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XDNE.DE | XMK9.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -35.20% | -34.30% | -0.90% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.96% | -9.73% | -0.23% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -21.73% | -21.74% | +0.01% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.73% | -21.74% | +0.01% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.20% | -34.30% | -0.90% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.20% | -3.16% | -0.04% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.27% | -7.62% | -0.65% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.96% | 2.99% | -0.03% |
Volatility
XDNE.DE vs. XMK9.DE - Volatility Comparison
Xtrackers MSCI Japan Screened UCITS ETF EUR Hedged (Acc) (XDNE.DE) and Xtrackers MSCI Japan UCITS ETF 4C EUR Hedged (XMK9.DE) have volatilities of 6.99% and 7.31%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XDNE.DE | XMK9.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.99% | 7.31% | -0.32% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.52% | 16.45% | +0.07% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.91% | 20.66% | +0.25% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.70% | 18.90% | -0.20% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.48% | 18.51% | -0.03% |
XDNE.DE vs. XMK9.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
XDNE.DE has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than XMK9.DE's 0.40% expense ratio.
Dividends
XDNE.DE vs. XMK9.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither XDNE.DE nor XMK9.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.96, XDNE.DE and XMK9.DE move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, XDNE.DE is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XDNE.DE is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for XMK9.DE.
XDNE.DE tracks MSCI Japan Select Screened Index (EUR Hedged), while XMK9.DE tracks MSCI Japan. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for XDNE.DE and 0.40% for XMK9.DE.
Find the right allocation for XDNE.DE and XMK9.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer