PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QDVD.DE vs. EMNJ.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

QDVD.DE vs. EMNJ.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in iShares MSCI USA Quality Dividend Advanced UCITS ETF (QDVD.DE) and iShares MSCI Japan CTB Enhanced ESG UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (EMNJ.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QDVD.DE achieves a 16.81% return, which is significantly lower than EMNJ.DE's 19.97% return.


QDVD.DE

1D
-0.26%
1M
0.51%
6M
14.53%
YTD
16.81%
1Y
26.15%
3Y*
17.23%
5Y*
12.61%
10Y*
10.69%

EMNJ.DE

1D
-0.76%
1M
1.81%
6M
13.73%
YTD
19.97%
1Y
39.88%
3Y*
16.68%
5Y*
9.72%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QDVD.DE vs. EMNJ.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
QDVD.DE
iShares MSCI USA Quality Dividend Advanced UCITS ETF
16.81%4.15%21.92%10.55%-1.08%32.39%-9.18%13.09%
EMNJ.DE
iShares MSCI Japan CTB Enhanced ESG UCITS ETF USD (Dist)
19.97%12.87%10.79%16.08%-13.34%9.71%5.81%3.88%

Correlation

The correlation between QDVD.DE and EMNJ.DE is 0.55, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.55

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.52

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.51

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 8, 2019

0.55

The correlation between QDVD.DE and EMNJ.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.51 to 0.55 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QDVD.DE vs. EMNJ.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QDVD.DE
QDVD.DE Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
QDVD.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QDVD.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
QDVD.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
QDVD.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
QDVD.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank

EMNJ.DE
EMNJ.DE Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
EMNJ.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EMNJ.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
EMNJ.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
EMNJ.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
EMNJ.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QDVD.DE vs. EMNJ.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI USA Quality Dividend Advanced UCITS ETF (QDVD.DE) and iShares MSCI Japan CTB Enhanced ESG UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (EMNJ.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


QDVD.DEEMNJ.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.39

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.53

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.43

1.36

+0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.39

3.71

+1.68

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

18.98

12.48

+6.49

QDVD.DE vs. EMNJ.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QDVD.DE Sharpe Ratio is 2.33, which is comparable to the EMNJ.DE Sharpe Ratio of 1.94. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QDVD.DE and EMNJ.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

QDVD.DE vs. EMNJ.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QDVD.DE drawdown since its inception was -32.55%, which is greater than EMNJ.DE's maximum drawdown of -28.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QDVD.DE and EMNJ.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QDVD.DEEMNJ.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-32.55%

-28.10%

-4.45%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.83%

-10.70%

+5.87%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.55%

-16.91%

-4.64%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.55%

-19.91%

-1.64%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.55%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.56%

-2.74%

+1.18%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.63%

-6.57%

+1.94%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.37%

3.19%

-1.82%

Volatility

QDVD.DE vs. EMNJ.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares MSCI USA Quality Dividend Advanced UCITS ETF (QDVD.DE) is 2.54%, while iShares MSCI Japan CTB Enhanced ESG UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (EMNJ.DE) has a volatility of 6.67%. This indicates that QDVD.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EMNJ.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QDVD.DEEMNJ.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.54%

6.67%

-4.13%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.84%

16.64%

-8.80%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.20%

20.49%

-9.29%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.87%

17.02%

-3.15%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.79%

18.26%

-3.47%

QDVD.DE vs. EMNJ.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

QDVD.DE has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than EMNJ.DE's 0.15% expense ratio.


Dividends

QDVD.DE vs. EMNJ.DE - Dividend Comparison

QDVD.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.48%, more than EMNJ.DE's 1.42% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EMNJ.DE
iShares MSCI Japan CTB Enhanced ESG UCITS ETF USD (Dist)
1.42%1.58%1.80%1.75%2.16%1.66%1.63%1.72%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
QDVD.DE
iShares MSCI USA Quality Dividend Advanced UCITS ETF
1.48%1.72%1.88%2.04%2.34%1.99%2.72%2.37%2.43%2.28%2.19%2.44%

Frequently Asked Questions


QDVD.DE and EMNJ.DE have a correlation of 0.55, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, EMNJ.DE is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

EMNJ.DE is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for QDVD.DE.

QDVD.DE is categorized as ESG, while EMNJ.DE is Japan Equities. QDVD.DE tracks MSCI USA High Dividend Yield ESG Reduced Carbon Target Select Index, while EMNJ.DE tracks MSCI Japan ESG Enhanced Focus CTB Index. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for QDVD.DE and 0.15% for EMNJ.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QDVD.DE and EMNJ.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer