QDVBX vs. QDIBX

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

QDVBX (Fisher Investments Institutional Group ESG Fixed Income Fund for Retirement Plans) and QDIBX (Fisher Investments Institutional Group Fixed Income Fund for Retirement Plans) are both Intermediate Core Bond funds from T. Rowe Price. Over the past 5 years, QDVBX returned -0.04%/yr vs 0.09%/yr for QDIBX. With a 0.98 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. QDVBX charges 0.04%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for QDIBX.

Performance

QDVBX vs. QDIBX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fisher Investments Institutional Group ESG Fixed Income Fund for Retirement Plans (QDVBX) and Fisher Investments Institutional Group Fixed Income Fund for Retirement Plans (QDIBX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with QDVBX having a -0.23% return and QDIBX slightly higher at -0.22%.

QDVBX

• 1D: -0.23%
• 1M: -0.11%
• YTD: -0.23%
• 6M: -0.12%
• 1Y: 3.97%
• 3Y*: 4.24%
• 5Y*: -0.04%
• 10Y*: —

QDIBX

• 1D: -0.11%
• 1M: -0.11%
• YTD: -0.22%
• 6M: -0.09%
• 1Y: 4.08%
• 3Y*: 4.36%
• 5Y*: 0.09%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QDVBX vs. QDIBX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
QDVBX Fisher Investments Institutional Group ESG Fixed Income Fund for Retirement Plans	-0.23%	7.64%	1.62%	6.37%	-14.31%	-0.37%	6.70%	-0.10%
QDIBX Fisher Investments Institutional Group Fixed Income Fund for Retirement Plans	-0.22%	7.72%	1.66%	6.71%	-14.11%	-0.17%	6.77%	-0.10%

Correlation

The correlation between QDVBX and QDIBX is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.96
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.98
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.98
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 16, 2019	0.98

The correlation between QDVBX and QDIBX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.96 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

QDVBX vs. QDIBX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QDVBX

QDVBX Risk / Return Rank: 18
QDVBX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 18
QDVBX Sortino Ratio Rank: 20
QDVBX Omega Ratio Rank: 17
QDVBX Calmar Ratio Rank: 19
QDVBX Martin Ratio Rank: 18

QDIBX

QDIBX Risk / Return Rank: 19
QDIBX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 19
QDIBX Sortino Ratio Rank: 20
QDIBX Omega Ratio Rank: 18
QDIBX Calmar Ratio Rank: 20
QDIBX Martin Ratio Rank: 18

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QDVBX vs. QDIBX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fisher Investments Institutional Group ESG Fixed Income Fund for Retirement Plans (QDVBX) and Fisher Investments Institutional Group Fixed Income Fund for Retirement Plans (QDIBX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	QDVBX	QDIBX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.19	1.23	-0.04
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.81	1.84	-0.03
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.21	1.22	-0.01
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.53	1.58	-0.05
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	4.70	4.77	-0.07
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

QDVBX vs. QDIBX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QDVBX Sharpe Ratio is 1.19, which is comparable to the QDIBX Sharpe Ratio of 1.23. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QDVBX and QDIBX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	QDVBX	QDIBX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.19	1.23	-0.04
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.01	0.01	-0.02
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.14	0.16	-0.02

Drawdowns

QDVBX vs. QDIBX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QDVBX drawdown since its inception was -19.86%, roughly equal to the maximum QDIBX drawdown of -19.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QDVBX and QDIBX.

Drawdown Indicators

	QDVBX	QDIBX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-19.86%	-19.63%	-0.23%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-3.00%	-2.97%	-0.03%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-5.37%	-5.37%	0.00%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-19.86%	-19.63%	-0.23%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.31%	-1.98%	-0.33%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.67%	-6.39%	-0.28%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.97%	0.98%	-0.01%

Volatility

QDVBX vs. QDIBX - Volatility Comparison

Fisher Investments Institutional Group ESG Fixed Income Fund for Retirement Plans (QDVBX) and Fisher Investments Institutional Group Fixed Income Fund for Retirement Plans (QDIBX) have volatilities of 1.24% and 1.25%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	QDVBX	QDIBX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.24%	1.25%	-0.01%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.57%	2.60%	-0.03%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.85%	3.82%	+0.03%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	6.61%	6.59%	+0.02%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	6.23%	6.26%	-0.03%

QDVBX vs. QDIBX - Expense Ratio Comparison

QDVBX has a 0.04% expense ratio, which is higher than QDIBX's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

QDVBX vs. QDIBX - Dividend Comparison

QDVBX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.51%, which matches QDIBX's 3.51% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
QDIBX Fisher Investments Institutional Group Fixed Income Fund for Retirement Plans	3.51%	3.50%	3.55%	3.65%	2.51%	1.80%	3.25%
QDVBX Fisher Investments Institutional Group ESG Fixed Income Fund for Retirement Plans	3.51%	3.51%	3.52%	3.66%	2.56%	1.70%	3.28%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both QDVBX and QDIBX in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.96, QDVBX and QDIBX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, QDVBX or QDIBX?

QDIBX has higher volatility (1.25%) compared to QDVBX (1.24%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QDVBX dropped -19.86% vs QDIBX's -19.63%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

QDIBX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.23 vs 1.19), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.