QDVB.DE vs. SC0H.DE
QDVB.DE (iShares Edge MSCI USA Quality Factor UCITS ETF) and SC0H.DE (Invesco MSCI USA UCITS ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds - QDVB.DE tracks the MSCI USA Sector Neutral Quality while SC0H.DE tracks the MSCI USA. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, QDVB.DE returned 12.96%/yr vs 14.59%/yr for SC0H.DE. With a 0.97 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. QDVB.DE charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.05%/yr for SC0H.DE.
Performance
QDVB.DE vs. SC0H.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QDVB.DE achieves a 9.84% return, which is significantly lower than SC0H.DE's 11.30% return.
QDVB.DE
- 1D
- 0.72%
- 1M
- 5.60%
- YTD
- 9.84%
- 6M
- 9.96%
- 1Y
- 19.74%
- 3Y*
- 16.51%
- 5Y*
- 12.96%
- 10Y*
- —
SC0H.DE
- 1D
- -0.11%
- 1M
- 5.36%
- YTD
- 11.30%
- 6M
- 11.28%
- 1Y
- 25.34%
- 3Y*
- 19.18%
- 5Y*
- 14.59%
- 10Y*
- 15.07%
QDVB.DE vs. SC0H.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QDVB.DE iShares Edge MSCI USA Quality Factor UCITS ETF | 9.84% | 0.36% | 29.35% | 26.56% | -16.50% | 39.05% | 5.36% | 37.25% | -2.65% | 7.18% |
SC0H.DE Invesco MSCI USA UCITS ETF | 11.30% | 4.77% | 32.56% | 23.60% | -15.55% | 38.99% | 9.76% | 35.08% | -1.12% | 6.55% |
Correlation
The correlation between QDVB.DE and SC0H.DE is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.91 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.96 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 25, 2016 | 0.97 |
The correlation between QDVB.DE and SC0H.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QDVB.DE vs. SC0H.DE — Risk / Return Rank
QDVB.DE
SC0H.DE
QDVB.DE vs. SC0H.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Edge MSCI USA Quality Factor UCITS ETF (QDVB.DE) and Invesco MSCI USA UCITS ETF (SC0H.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| QDVB.DE | SC0H.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.39 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.40 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.33 | 1.40 | -0.07 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.92 | 3.45 | -0.53 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.33 | 11.96 | -1.63 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| QDVB.DE | SC0H.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.77 | 2.16 | -0.39 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.83 | 0.94 | -0.11 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.92 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.83 | 0.98 | -0.15 |
Drawdowns
QDVB.DE vs. SC0H.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QDVB.DE drawdown since its inception was -33.26%, roughly equal to the maximum SC0H.DE drawdown of -34.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QDVB.DE and SC0H.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QDVB.DE | SC0H.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.26% | -34.20% | +0.94% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.74% | -7.32% | +0.58% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -22.66% | -23.66% | +1.00% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.66% | -23.66% | +1.00% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -34.20% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.41% | +0.41% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.97% | -4.13% | -0.84% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.91% | 2.11% | -0.20% |
Volatility
QDVB.DE vs. SC0H.DE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Edge MSCI USA Quality Factor UCITS ETF (QDVB.DE) is 2.46%, while Invesco MSCI USA UCITS ETF (SC0H.DE) has a volatility of 2.68%. This indicates that QDVB.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SC0H.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QDVB.DE | SC0H.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.46% | 2.68% | -0.22% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.27% | 7.66% | -0.39% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.09% | 11.67% | -0.58% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.53% | 15.41% | +0.12% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.44% | 16.23% | +0.21% |
QDVB.DE vs. SC0H.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
QDVB.DE has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than SC0H.DE's 0.05% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
QDVB.DE vs. SC0H.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither QDVB.DE nor SC0H.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.91, QDVB.DE and SC0H.DE move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, SC0H.DE is cheaper at 0.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SC0H.DE is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for QDVB.DE.
QDVB.DE tracks MSCI USA Sector Neutral Quality, while SC0H.DE tracks MSCI USA. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for QDVB.DE and 0.05% for SC0H.DE.
Find the right allocation for QDVB.DE and SC0H.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer