SC0H.DE vs. XZMU.DE
Compare and contrast key facts about Invesco MSCI USA UCITS ETF (SC0H.DE) and Xtrackers MSCI USA ESG UCITS ETF 1C (XZMU.DE).
SC0H.DE and XZMU.DE are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. SC0H.DE is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the MSCI USA. It was launched on Mar 31, 2009. XZMU.DE is a passively managed fund by Xtrackers that tracks the performance of the MSCI USA Low Carbon SRI Leaders. It was launched on May 8, 2018. Both SC0H.DE and XZMU.DE are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: SC0H.DE or XZMU.DE.
Key characteristics
| SC0H.DE | XZMU.DE | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 30.42% | 31.67% |
| 1Y Return | 38.75% | 40.72% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | 12.11% | 11.95% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | 16.40% | 17.95% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 3.06 | 2.89 |
| Sortino Ratio | 4.15 | 3.89 |
| Omega Ratio | 1.63 | 1.57 |
| Calmar Ratio | 4.38 | 4.09 |
| Martin Ratio | 19.73 | 16.02 |
| Ulcer Index | 1.87% | 2.41% |
| Daily Std Dev | 11.99% | 13.31% |
| Max Drawdown | -34.20% | -33.82% |
| Current Drawdown | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Correlation
The correlation between SC0H.DE and XZMU.DE is 0.88, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
SC0H.DE vs. XZMU.DE - Performance Comparison
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with SC0H.DE having a 30.42% return and XZMU.DE slightly higher at 31.67%. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
SC0H.DE vs. XZMU.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
SC0H.DE has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is lower than XZMU.DE's 0.15% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
SC0H.DE vs. XZMU.DE - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco MSCI USA UCITS ETF (SC0H.DE) and Xtrackers MSCI USA ESG UCITS ETF 1C (XZMU.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
SC0H.DE vs. XZMU.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither SC0H.DE nor XZMU.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
SC0H.DE vs. XZMU.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SC0H.DE drawdown since its inception was -34.20%, roughly equal to the maximum XZMU.DE drawdown of -33.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SC0H.DE and XZMU.DE. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
SC0H.DE vs. XZMU.DE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Invesco MSCI USA UCITS ETF (SC0H.DE) is 3.49%, while Xtrackers MSCI USA ESG UCITS ETF 1C (XZMU.DE) has a volatility of 3.87%. This indicates that SC0H.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XZMU.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.