PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QDVA.DE vs. MTUM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

QDVA.DE vs. MTUM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in iShares Edge MSCI USA Momentum Factor UCITS ETF (QDVA.DE) and iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF (MTUM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

QDVA.DE is traded in EUR, while MTUM is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the MTUM values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QDVA.DE achieves a 30.20% return, which is significantly lower than MTUM's 31.79% return.


QDVA.DE

1D
-2.00%
1M
12.85%
YTD
30.20%
6M
30.17%
1Y
37.02%
3Y*
28.68%
5Y*
15.17%
10Y*

MTUM

1D
-1.24%
1M
12.69%
YTD
31.79%
6M
30.33%
1Y
38.19%
3Y*
30.77%
5Y*
16.03%
10Y*
16.93%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QDVA.DE vs. MTUM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
QDVA.DE
iShares Edge MSCI USA Momentum Factor UCITS ETF
30.20%5.11%40.00%5.98%-13.66%22.93%17.39%31.13%1.12%20.30%
MTUM
iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF
31.79%7.65%41.66%5.87%-13.20%21.84%19.16%30.13%2.94%20.60%

Correlation

The correlation between QDVA.DE and MTUM is 0.72, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.72

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.67

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.65

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 25, 2016

0.63

The correlation between QDVA.DE and MTUM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.63 to 0.72 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QDVA.DE vs. MTUM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QDVA.DE
QDVA.DE Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
QDVA.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QDVA.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
QDVA.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
QDVA.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
QDVA.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank

MTUM
MTUM Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
MTUM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MTUM Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
MTUM Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
MTUM Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
MTUM Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QDVA.DE vs. MTUM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Edge MSCI USA Momentum Factor UCITS ETF (QDVA.DE) and iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF (MTUM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


QDVA.DEMTUMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.09

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.09

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.36

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.89

4.02

-0.14

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.67

13.80

-1.12

QDVA.DE vs. MTUM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QDVA.DE Sharpe Ratio is 1.96, which is comparable to the MTUM Sharpe Ratio of 2.05. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QDVA.DE and MTUM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


QDVA.DEMTUMDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.96

2.05

-0.09

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.79

0.78

0.00

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.79

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.83

0.85

-0.02

Drawdowns

QDVA.DE vs. MTUM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QDVA.DE drawdown since its inception was -33.34%, roughly equal to the maximum MTUM drawdown of -33.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QDVA.DE and MTUM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QDVA.DEMTUMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.34%

-33.58%

+0.24%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.48%

-9.54%

+0.06%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-25.56%

-24.93%

-0.63%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.56%

-25.86%

+0.30%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.58%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.00%

-1.24%

-0.76%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.84%

-5.82%

-1.02%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.91%

2.78%

+0.13%

Volatility

QDVA.DE vs. MTUM - Volatility Comparison

iShares Edge MSCI USA Momentum Factor UCITS ETF (QDVA.DE) has a higher volatility of 7.65% compared to iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF (MTUM) at 7.07%. This indicates that QDVA.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MTUM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QDVA.DEMTUMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.65%

7.07%

+0.58%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.66%

15.54%

+0.12%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.82%

18.73%

+0.09%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.11%

20.54%

-1.43%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.19%

21.45%

-2.26%

QDVA.DE vs. MTUM - Expense Ratio Comparison

QDVA.DE has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than MTUM's 0.15% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

QDVA.DE vs. MTUM - Dividend Comparison

QDVA.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while MTUM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.60%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MTUM
iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF
0.60%0.91%0.75%1.35%1.80%0.55%0.83%1.48%1.27%1.02%1.43%1.12%
QDVA.DE
iShares Edge MSCI USA Momentum Factor UCITS ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


QDVA.DE and MTUM have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, MTUM is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

MTUM is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for QDVA.DE.

QDVA.DE tracks MSCI USA Momentum Index, while MTUM tracks MSCI USA Momentum SR Variant Index. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for QDVA.DE and 0.15% for MTUM.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QDVA.DE and MTUM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer