PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QDVA.DE vs. CEMQ.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

QDVA.DE vs. CEMQ.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in iShares Edge MSCI USA Momentum Factor UCITS ETF (QDVA.DE) and iShares Edge MSCI Europe Quality Factor UCITS ETF (CEMQ.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QDVA.DE achieves a 31.46% return, which is significantly higher than CEMQ.DE's 6.82% return.


QDVA.DE

1D
3.87%
1M
8.17%
YTD
31.46%
6M
34.06%
1Y
41.31%
3Y*
28.53%
5Y*
15.30%
10Y*

CEMQ.DE

1D
1.45%
1M
4.11%
YTD
6.82%
6M
9.07%
1Y
9.48%
3Y*
8.41%
5Y*
6.17%
10Y*
8.78%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QDVA.DE vs. CEMQ.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
QDVA.DE
iShares Edge MSCI USA Momentum Factor UCITS ETF
31.46%5.15%39.98%5.96%-13.64%22.86%17.47%31.11%1.04%20.37%
CEMQ.DE
iShares Edge MSCI Europe Quality Factor UCITS ETF
6.82%10.19%3.69%14.57%-11.90%26.61%1.06%32.46%-7.32%10.41%

Correlation

The correlation between QDVA.DE and CEMQ.DE is 0.48, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.48

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.50

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.55

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 13, 2016

0.60

The correlation between QDVA.DE and CEMQ.DE shifts across timeframes, from 0.48 (1 year) to 0.60 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QDVA.DE vs. CEMQ.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QDVA.DE
QDVA.DE Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
QDVA.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QDVA.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
QDVA.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
QDVA.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
QDVA.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank

CEMQ.DE
CEMQ.DE Risk / Return Rank: 2525
Overall Rank
CEMQ.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2525
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CEMQ.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 2424
Sortino Ratio Rank
CEMQ.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 2323
Omega Ratio Rank
CEMQ.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 2626
Calmar Ratio Rank
CEMQ.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 2828
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QDVA.DE vs. CEMQ.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Edge MSCI USA Momentum Factor UCITS ETF (QDVA.DE) and iShares Edge MSCI Europe Quality Factor UCITS ETF (CEMQ.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


QDVA.DECEMQ.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.32

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.79

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.37

1.14

+0.23

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.33

1.13

+3.20

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.88

3.44

+10.44

QDVA.DE vs. CEMQ.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QDVA.DE Sharpe Ratio is 2.10, which is higher than the CEMQ.DE Sharpe Ratio of 0.78. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QDVA.DE and CEMQ.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

QDVA.DE vs. CEMQ.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QDVA.DE drawdown since its inception was -33.33%, roughly equal to the maximum CEMQ.DE drawdown of -33.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QDVA.DE and CEMQ.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QDVA.DECEMQ.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.33%

-33.76%

+0.43%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.50%

-8.38%

-1.12%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-25.56%

-14.96%

-10.60%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.56%

-19.65%

-5.91%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.76%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.01%

-0.08%

-0.93%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.95%

-5.35%

-1.60%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.97%

2.70%

+0.27%

Volatility

QDVA.DE vs. CEMQ.DE - Volatility Comparison

iShares Edge MSCI USA Momentum Factor UCITS ETF (QDVA.DE) has a higher volatility of 8.61% compared to iShares Edge MSCI Europe Quality Factor UCITS ETF (CEMQ.DE) at 3.75%. This indicates that QDVA.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CEMQ.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QDVA.DECEMQ.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.61%

3.75%

+4.86%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.57%

9.71%

+6.86%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.56%

12.07%

+7.49%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.26%

14.05%

+5.21%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.34%

15.02%

+4.32%

QDVA.DE vs. CEMQ.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

QDVA.DE has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than CEMQ.DE's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

QDVA.DE vs. CEMQ.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither QDVA.DE nor CEMQ.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


QDVA.DE and CEMQ.DE have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, QDVA.DE is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

QDVA.DE is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for CEMQ.DE.

QDVA.DE is categorized as Momentum, while CEMQ.DE is Europe Equities. QDVA.DE tracks MSCI USA Momentum Index, while CEMQ.DE tracks MSCI Europe Sector Neutral Quality. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for QDVA.DE and 0.25% for CEMQ.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QDVA.DE and CEMQ.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer