PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CEMQ.DE vs. ^GSPC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

CEMQ.DE vs. ^GSPC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in iShares Edge MSCI Europe Quality Factor UCITS ETF (CEMQ.DE) and S&P 500 Index (^GSPC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

CEMQ.DE is traded in EUR, while ^GSPC is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the ^GSPC values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CEMQ.DE achieves a 4.17% return, which is significantly lower than ^GSPC's 12.06% return.


CEMQ.DE

1D
0.82%
1M
-0.63%
YTD
4.17%
6M
5.95%
1Y
6.60%
3Y*
7.83%
5Y*
5.86%
10Y*
7.82%

^GSPC

1D
0.00%
1M
4.16%
YTD
12.06%
6M
10.65%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CEMQ.DE vs. ^GSPC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
CEMQ.DE
iShares Edge MSCI Europe Quality Factor UCITS ETF
4.17%2.07%
^GSPC
S&P 500 Index
9.98%10.65%

Correlation

The correlation between CEMQ.DE and ^GSPC is 0.43, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 9, 2025

0.43

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CEMQ.DE vs. ^GSPC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CEMQ.DE
CEMQ.DE Risk / Return Rank: 1919
Overall Rank
CEMQ.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1919
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CEMQ.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 1818
Sortino Ratio Rank
CEMQ.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
CEMQ.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 2020
Calmar Ratio Rank
CEMQ.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 1919
Martin Ratio Rank

^GSPC
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CEMQ.DE vs. ^GSPC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Edge MSCI Europe Quality Factor UCITS ETF (CEMQ.DE) and S&P 500 Index (^GSPC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CEMQ.DE^GSPCDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.80

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.14

CEMQ.DE vs. ^GSPC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CEMQ.DE^GSPCDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.57

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.41

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.52

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.48

1.98

-1.51

Drawdowns

CEMQ.DE vs. ^GSPC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CEMQ.DE drawdown since its inception was -33.74%, which is greater than ^GSPC's maximum drawdown of -7.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CEMQ.DE and ^GSPC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CEMQ.DE^GSPCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.74%

-7.57%

-26.17%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.40%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.90%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.69%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.74%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.60%

-0.20%

-2.40%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.35%

-1.39%

-3.96%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.17%

Volatility

CEMQ.DE vs. ^GSPC - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CEMQ.DE^GSPCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.97%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.53%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.93%

12.22%

-0.29%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.02%

12.22%

+1.80%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.02%

12.22%

+2.80%

Frequently Asked Questions


CEMQ.DE and ^GSPC have a correlation of 0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CEMQ.DE and ^GSPC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer