PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QDV5.DE vs. BNDW
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

QDV5.DE vs. BNDW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in iShares MSCI India UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (QDV5.DE) and Vanguard Total World Bond ETF (BNDW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

QDV5.DE is traded in EUR, while BNDW is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the BNDW values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QDV5.DE achieves a -10.52% return, which is significantly lower than BNDW's 2.31% return.


QDV5.DE

1D
2.49%
1M
2.21%
YTD
-10.52%
6M
-9.98%
1Y
-13.04%
3Y*
2.71%
5Y*
4.53%
10Y*

BNDW

1D
0.11%
1M
1.95%
YTD
2.31%
6M
2.54%
1Y
3.36%
3Y*
1.86%
5Y*
1.10%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QDV5.DE vs. BNDW - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
QDV5.DE
iShares MSCI India UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
-10.52%-8.01%15.55%14.92%-1.74%35.10%3.45%10.54%-1.98%
BNDW
Vanguard Total World Bond ETF
2.31%-7.44%9.18%3.97%-7.48%5.23%-2.54%10.82%2.67%

Correlation

The correlation between QDV5.DE and BNDW is 0.24, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.24

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.22

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.14

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 6, 2018

0.10

The correlation between QDV5.DE and BNDW shifts across timeframes, from 0.10 (all time) to 0.24 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QDV5.DE vs. BNDW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QDV5.DE
QDV5.DE Risk / Return Rank: 33
Overall Rank
QDV5.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QDV5.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
Sortino Ratio Rank
QDV5.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 44
Omega Ratio Rank
QDV5.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
Calmar Ratio Rank
QDV5.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 11
Martin Ratio Rank

BNDW
BNDW Risk / Return Rank: 2828
Overall Rank
BNDW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3030
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BNDW Sortino Ratio Rank: 2828
Sortino Ratio Rank
BNDW Omega Ratio Rank: 2727
Omega Ratio Rank
BNDW Calmar Ratio Rank: 2828
Calmar Ratio Rank
BNDW Martin Ratio Rank: 2626
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QDV5.DE vs. BNDW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI India UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (QDV5.DE) and Vanguard Total World Bond ETF (BNDW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


QDV5.DEBNDWDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.37

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.94

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.88

1.11

-0.23

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.67

0.76

-1.43

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.48

2.11

-3.59

QDV5.DE vs. BNDW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QDV5.DE Sharpe Ratio is -0.79, which is lower than the BNDW Sharpe Ratio of 0.58. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QDV5.DE and BNDW, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

QDV5.DE vs. BNDW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QDV5.DE drawdown since its inception was -41.02%, which is greater than BNDW's maximum drawdown of -13.02%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QDV5.DE and BNDW.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QDV5.DEBNDWDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-41.02%

-13.02%

-28.00%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-19.42%

-4.45%

-14.97%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.47%

-11.33%

-16.14%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.47%

-12.17%

-15.30%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-23.00%

-6.97%

-16.03%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.17%

-5.77%

-2.40%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

8.81%

1.59%

+7.22%

Volatility

QDV5.DE vs. BNDW - Volatility Comparison

iShares MSCI India UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (QDV5.DE) has a higher volatility of 5.30% compared to Vanguard Total World Bond ETF (BNDW) at 0.95%. This indicates that QDV5.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BNDW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QDV5.DEBNDWDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.30%

0.95%

+4.35%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.86%

4.19%

+9.67%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.64%

5.82%

+10.82%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.55%

8.06%

+8.49%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.66%

7.83%

+13.83%

QDV5.DE vs. BNDW - Expense Ratio Comparison

QDV5.DE has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than BNDW's 0.05% expense ratio.


Dividends

QDV5.DE vs. BNDW - Dividend Comparison

QDV5.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while BNDW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.20%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
BNDW
Vanguard Total World Bond ETF
4.20%4.12%3.90%3.73%2.02%2.58%1.56%3.05%1.66%
QDV5.DE
iShares MSCI India UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


QDV5.DE and BNDW have a correlation of 0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, BNDW is cheaper at 0.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

BNDW is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for QDV5.DE.

QDV5.DE is categorized as Asia Pacific Equities, while BNDW is Global Bonds. QDV5.DE tracks MSCI India, while BNDW tracks Bloomberg Global Aggregate Float Adjusted Composite Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for QDV5.DE and 0.05% for BNDW.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QDV5.DE and BNDW

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer