QDSNX vs. COTZX
Compare and contrast key facts about AQR Diversifying Strategies Fund Class N (QDSNX) and Columbia Thermostat Fund (COTZX).
QDSNX is an actively managed fund by AQR Funds. It was launched on Jun 8, 2020. COTZX is managed by Columbia. It was launched on Sep 24, 2002.
Performance
QDSNX vs. COTZX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
QDSNX vs. COTZX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QDSNX AQR Diversifying Strategies Fund Class N | 3.15% | 16.14% | 9.56% | 8.62% | 14.48% | 10.35% | 5.40% |
COTZX Columbia Thermostat Fund | -1.58% | 15.02% | 7.98% | 11.66% | -12.92% | 6.44% | 11.33% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QDSNX achieves a 3.15% return, which is significantly higher than COTZX's -1.58% return.
QDSNX
- 1D
- 0.35%
- 1M
- -0.83%
- YTD
- 3.15%
- 6M
- 5.90%
- 1Y
- 11.69%
- 3Y*
- 12.58%
- 5Y*
- 10.95%
- 10Y*
- —
COTZX
- 1D
- 1.22%
- 1M
- -2.29%
- YTD
- -1.58%
- 6M
- -0.40%
- 1Y
- 12.29%
- 3Y*
- 9.35%
- 5Y*
- 4.20%
- 10Y*
- 7.08%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
QDSNX vs. COTZX - Expense Ratio Comparison
QDSNX has a 3.30% expense ratio, which is higher than COTZX's 0.24% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
QDSNX vs. COTZX — Risk / Return Rank
QDSNX
COTZX
QDSNX vs. COTZX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AQR Diversifying Strategies Fund Class N (QDSNX) and Columbia Thermostat Fund (COTZX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| QDSNX | COTZX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.95 | 1.49 | +0.47 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.47 | 2.39 | +0.08 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.41 | 1.37 | +0.04 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.26 | 2.41 | -0.15 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.64 | 12.35 | -2.71 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| QDSNX | COTZX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.95 | 1.49 | +0.47 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.44 | 0.58 | +0.86 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.96 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.59 | 0.63 | +0.96 |
Correlation
The correlation between QDSNX and COTZX is 0.10, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
QDSNX vs. COTZX - Dividend Comparison
QDSNX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.93%, less than COTZX's 3.42% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QDSNX AQR Diversifying Strategies Fund Class N | 1.93% | 1.99% | 0.00% | 11.18% | 8.01% | 5.99% | 1.83% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
COTZX Columbia Thermostat Fund | 3.42% | 3.37% | 3.55% | 2.74% | 3.28% | 14.82% | 6.92% | 5.57% | 4.45% | 3.13% | 2.66% | 4.26% |
Drawdowns
QDSNX vs. COTZX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QDSNX drawdown since its inception was -7.15%, smaller than the maximum COTZX drawdown of -47.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QDSNX and COTZX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| QDSNX | COTZX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -7.15% | -47.48% | +40.33% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.48% | -5.40% | -0.08% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -7.15% | -17.80% | +10.65% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -17.80% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.96% | -2.62% | +1.66% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.49% | -3.49% | +2.00% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.30% | 1.05% | +0.25% |
Volatility
QDSNX vs. COTZX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for AQR Diversifying Strategies Fund Class N (QDSNX) is 1.61%, while Columbia Thermostat Fund (COTZX) has a volatility of 2.55%. This indicates that QDSNX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than COTZX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| QDSNX | COTZX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.61% | 2.55% | -0.94% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.69% | 3.61% | +0.08% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 6.32% | 8.58% | -2.26% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 7.63% | 7.30% | +0.33% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 7.37% | 7.36% | +0.01% |