PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QDSIX vs. TMSRX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

QDSIX vs. TMSRX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AQR Diversifying Strategies Fund (QDSIX) and T. Rowe Price Multi-Strategy Total Return Fund (TMSRX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QDSIX achieves a 5.50% return, which is significantly higher than TMSRX's 0.41% return.


QDSIX

1D
0.41%
1M
0.41%
YTD
5.50%
6M
5.72%
1Y
13.96%
3Y*
12.64%
5Y*
11.53%
10Y*

TMSRX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.00%
YTD
0.41%
6M
0.53%
1Y
3.38%
3Y*
4.02%
5Y*
0.99%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QDSIX vs. TMSRX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
QDSIX
AQR Diversifying Strategies Fund
5.50%16.36%9.71%8.88%14.69%10.64%5.50%
TMSRX
T. Rowe Price Multi-Strategy Total Return Fund
0.41%2.95%5.36%5.09%-4.69%-2.08%10.02%

Correlation

The correlation between QDSIX and TMSRX is 0.21, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.21

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.25

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.09

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 10, 2020

0.10

The correlation between QDSIX and TMSRX shifts across timeframes, from 0.09 (5 years) to 0.25 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QDSIX vs. TMSRX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QDSIX
QDSIX Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
QDSIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QDSIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
QDSIX Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
QDSIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
QDSIX Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank

TMSRX
TMSRX Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
TMSRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TMSRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
TMSRX Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
TMSRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
TMSRX Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QDSIX vs. TMSRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AQR Diversifying Strategies Fund (QDSIX) and T. Rowe Price Multi-Strategy Total Return Fund (TMSRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


QDSIXTMSRXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.66

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.01

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.52

1.67

-0.15

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

7.21

4.22

+2.99

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

19.76

17.05

+2.71

QDSIX vs. TMSRX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QDSIX Sharpe Ratio is 2.75, which is higher than the TMSRX Sharpe Ratio of 2.10. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QDSIX and TMSRX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

QDSIX vs. TMSRX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QDSIX drawdown since its inception was -7.06%, smaller than the maximum TMSRX drawdown of -10.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QDSIX and TMSRX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QDSIXTMSRXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-7.06%

-10.67%

+3.61%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.96%

-0.83%

-1.13%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-6.90%

-2.79%

-4.11%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-7.06%

-10.59%

+3.53%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.94%

-0.16%

-0.78%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.44%

-2.71%

+1.27%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.71%

0.21%

+0.50%

Volatility

QDSIX vs. TMSRX - Volatility Comparison

AQR Diversifying Strategies Fund (QDSIX) has a higher volatility of 1.80% compared to T. Rowe Price Multi-Strategy Total Return Fund (TMSRX) at 0.00%. This indicates that QDSIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TMSRX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QDSIXTMSRXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.80%

0.00%

+1.80%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.66%

0.66%

+3.00%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.14%

1.68%

+3.46%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.62%

2.75%

+4.87%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

7.31%

3.27%

+4.04%

QDSIX vs. TMSRX - Expense Ratio Comparison

QDSIX has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than TMSRX's 1.19% expense ratio.


Dividends

QDSIX vs. TMSRX - Dividend Comparison

QDSIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.12%, less than TMSRX's 9.49% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
QDSIX
AQR Diversifying Strategies Fund
2.12%2.23%0.00%11.35%8.22%6.07%1.93%0.00%0.00%
TMSRX
T. Rowe Price Multi-Strategy Total Return Fund
9.49%7.59%6.72%5.95%2.29%2.88%3.35%3.00%3.56%

Frequently Asked Questions


QDSIX and TMSRX have a correlation of 0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

QDSIX has higher volatility (1.80%) compared to TMSRX (0.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QDSIX dropped -7.06% vs TMSRX's -10.67%.

QDSIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.75 vs 2.10), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QDSIX and TMSRX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer