QDIV vs. NDIV
QDIV (Global X S&P 500 Quality Dividend ETF) and NDIV (Amplify Natural Resources Dividend Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - QDIV is a Dividend fund tracking the S&P 500 Quality High Dividend Index, while NDIV is a Energy Equities fund tracking the EQM Natural Resources Dividend Income Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, QDIV returned 10.31%/yr vs 19.61%/yr for NDIV. A 0.68 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. QDIV charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.59%/yr for NDIV.
Performance
QDIV vs. NDIV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QDIV achieves a 8.88% return, which is significantly lower than NDIV's 34.08% return.
QDIV
- 1D
- 0.61%
- 1M
- 1.51%
- YTD
- 8.88%
- 6M
- 8.61%
- 1Y
- 14.92%
- 3Y*
- 10.31%
- 5Y*
- 6.30%
- 10Y*
- —
NDIV
- 1D
- 1.08%
- 1M
- -2.62%
- YTD
- 34.08%
- 6M
- 29.69%
- 1Y
- 37.09%
- 3Y*
- 19.61%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
QDIV vs. NDIV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QDIV Global X S&P 500 Quality Dividend ETF | 8.88% | 3.16% | 10.62% | 5.18% | 0.78% |
NDIV Amplify Natural Resources Dividend Income ETF | 34.08% | 2.85% | 6.18% | 15.52% | 1.82% |
Correlation
The correlation between QDIV and NDIV is 0.57, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.57 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.65 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 25, 2022 | 0.68 |
The correlation between QDIV and NDIV shifts across timeframes, from 0.57 (1 year) to 0.68 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
QDIV vs. NDIV - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
QDIV
NDIV
Consumer Defensive
-
Industrials
-
Healthcare
-
Energy
Basic Materials
Technology
-
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
-
Communication Services
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Consumer Defensive
QDIV
NDIV
-
Industrials
QDIV
NDIV
-
Healthcare
QDIV
NDIV
-
Energy
QDIV
NDIV
Basic Materials
QDIV
NDIV
Technology
QDIV
NDIV
-
Financial Services
QDIV
NDIV
Consumer Cyclical
QDIV
NDIV
-
Communication Services
QDIV
NDIV
-
Real Estate
QDIV
-
NDIV
-
Utilities
QDIV
-
NDIV
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QDIV vs. NDIV — Risk / Return Rank
QDIV
NDIV
QDIV vs. NDIV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X S&P 500 Quality Dividend ETF (QDIV) and Amplify Natural Resources Dividend Income ETF (NDIV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| QDIV | NDIV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.61 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.54 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.22 | 1.32 | -0.09 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.88 | 3.47 | -1.59 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.85 | 8.17 | -3.33 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| QDIV | NDIV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.27 | 1.88 | -0.61 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.41 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.44 | 0.74 | -0.31 |
Drawdowns
QDIV vs. NDIV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QDIV drawdown since its inception was -41.20%, which is greater than NDIV's maximum drawdown of -19.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QDIV and NDIV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QDIV | NDIV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -41.20% | -19.73% | -21.47% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.97% | -10.73% | +2.76% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.81% | -19.73% | +2.92% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.52% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.37% | -3.05% | -0.32% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.54% | -4.20% | -1.34% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.09% | 4.55% | -1.46% |
Volatility
QDIV vs. NDIV - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Global X S&P 500 Quality Dividend ETF (QDIV) is 2.52%, while Amplify Natural Resources Dividend Income ETF (NDIV) has a volatility of 4.72%. This indicates that QDIV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NDIV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QDIV | NDIV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.52% | 4.72% | -2.20% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.04% | 13.39% | -5.35% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.83% | 19.86% | -8.03% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.30% | 20.92% | -5.62% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.42% | 20.92% | -1.50% |
QDIV vs. NDIV - Expense Ratio Comparison
QDIV has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than NDIV's 0.59% expense ratio.
Dividends
QDIV vs. NDIV - Dividend Comparison
QDIV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.98%, less than NDIV's 6.46% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NDIV Amplify Natural Resources Dividend Income ETF | 6.46% | 5.64% | 5.88% | 7.37% | 1.69% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
QDIV Global X S&P 500 Quality Dividend ETF | 2.98% | 3.13% | 2.88% | 3.26% | 3.02% | 2.44% | 3.06% | 2.84% | 1.30% |
Frequently Asked Questions
QDIV and NDIV have a correlation of 0.57, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
NDIV has higher volatility (4.72%) compared to QDIV (2.52%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QDIV dropped -41.20% vs NDIV's -19.73%.
On 3-year performance, NDIV leads with 19.61% vs 10.31% for QDIV. On fees, QDIV is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, QDIV has been the lower-risk option at 2.52%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, NDIV has performed better with a 19.61% return vs 10.31%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
QDIV is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for NDIV.
NDIV has the higher dividend yield at 6.46%, compared with 2.98% for QDIV.
QDIV is categorized as Dividend, while NDIV is Energy Equities. QDIV tracks S&P 500 Quality High Dividend Index, while NDIV tracks EQM Natural Resources Dividend Income Index. They also come from different issuers: Global X and Amplify. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for QDIV and 0.59% for NDIV.
NDIV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.88 vs 1.27), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for QDIV and NDIV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer