QDIV vs. AVUQ

Last updated Aug 4, 2026

QDIV (Global X S&P 500 Quality Dividend ETF) and AVUQ (Avantis U.S. Quality ETF) are both Quality Factor funds. QDIV is passively managed, while AVUQ is actively managed. Over the past year, QDIV returned 22.22% vs 21.48% for AVUQ. Their 0.27 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. QDIV charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for AVUQ.

Performance

QDIV vs. AVUQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X S&P 500 Quality Dividend ETF (QDIV) and Avantis U.S. Quality ETF (AVUQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QDIV achieves a 16.62% return, which is significantly higher than AVUQ's 10.84% return.

QDIV

• 1D: 0.51%
• 1M: 4.41%
• 6M: 9.29%
• YTD: 16.62%
• 1Y: 22.22%
• 3Y*: 10.58%
• 5Y*: 8.61%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 9.23%

AVUQ

• 1D: 1.79%
• 1M: 1.73%
• 6M: 8.78%
• YTD: 10.84%
• 1Y: 21.48%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 24.88%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
AVUQ Avantis U.S. Quality ETF	$1.44M	$1.08M	$1.47M
QDIV Global X S&P 500 Quality Dividend ETF	$41.14K	$81.04K	$128.34K

QDIV vs. AVUQ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
QDIV Global X S&P 500 Quality Dividend ETF	16.62%	1.39%
AVUQ Avantis U.S. Quality ETF	10.84%	21.84%

Correlation

The correlation between QDIV and AVUQ is 0.13, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.13
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 27, 2025	0.27

The correlation between QDIV and AVUQ shifts across timeframes, from 0.13 (1 year) to 0.27 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

QDIV vs. AVUQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	QDIV	AVUQ
Consumer Defensive	22.1%	3.2%
Financial Services	20.1%	5.5%
Industrials	16.6%	8.9%
Healthcare	13.5%	5.7%
Technology	10.7%	47.2%
Energy	8.9%	2.1%
Consumer Cyclical	5.8%	13.3%
Communication Services	3.5%	12.2%
Basic Materials	2.1%	1.1%
Real Estate	-	0.1%
Utilities	-	0.7%

Return for Risk

QDIV vs. AVUQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

QDIV

QDIV Risk / Return Rank: 73
QDIV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
QDIV Sortino Ratio Rank: 82
QDIV Omega Ratio Rank: 74
QDIV Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
QDIV Martin Ratio Rank: 58

AVUQ

AVUQ Risk / Return Rank: 51
AVUQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 51
AVUQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 50
AVUQ Omega Ratio Rank: 47
AVUQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 51
AVUQ Martin Ratio Rank: 54

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

QDIV vs. AVUQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X S&P 500 Quality Dividend ETF (QDIV) and Avantis U.S. Quality ETF (AVUQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	QDIV	AVUQ	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.82	1.29	+0.52
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.77	1.85	+0.92
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.32	1.22	+0.10
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.80	1.86	+0.94
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	7.14	6.70	+0.44

QDIV vs. AVUQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QDIV Sharpe Ratio is 1.82, which is higher than the AVUQ Sharpe Ratio of 1.29. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QDIV and AVUQ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

QDIV vs. AVUQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QDIV drawdown since its inception was -41.20%, which is greater than AVUQ's maximum drawdown of -12.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QDIV and AVUQ.

Drawdown Indicators

	QDIV	AVUQ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-41.20%	-12.35%	-28.85%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.97%	-11.61%	+3.64%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-16.81%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-18.52%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.05%	-1.31%	+0.26%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.47%	-2.24%	-3.23%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.12%	3.21%	-0.09%

Volatility

QDIV vs. AVUQ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Global X S&P 500 Quality Dividend ETF (QDIV) is 4.87%, while Avantis U.S. Quality ETF (AVUQ) has a volatility of 5.21%. This indicates that QDIV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AVUQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	QDIV	AVUQ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.87%	5.21%	-0.34%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.12%	13.15%	-4.03%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.31%	16.70%	-4.39%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.32%	19.44%	-4.12%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.35%	19.44%	-0.09%

QDIV vs. AVUQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

QDIV has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than AVUQ's 0.15% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

QDIV vs. AVUQ - Dividend Comparison

QDIV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.79%, more than AVUQ's 0.30% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
AVUQ Avantis U.S. Quality ETF	0.30%	0.32%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
QDIV Global X S&P 500 Quality Dividend ETF	2.79%	3.13%	2.88%	3.26%	3.02%	2.44%	3.06%	2.84%	1.30%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both QDIV and AVUQ in my portfolio?

QDIV and AVUQ have a correlation of 0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, QDIV or AVUQ?

AVUQ has higher volatility (5.21%) compared to QDIV (4.87%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QDIV dropped -41.20% vs AVUQ's -12.35%.

Which ETF is better, QDIV or AVUQ?

On 1-year performance, QDIV leads with 22.22% vs 21.48% for AVUQ. On fees, AVUQ is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, QDIV has been the lower-risk option at 4.87%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, QDIV or AVUQ?

Over the 1-year period, QDIV has performed better with a 22.22% return vs 21.48%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, QDIV or AVUQ?

AVUQ is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for QDIV.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, QDIV or AVUQ?

QDIV has the higher dividend yield at 2.79%, compared with 0.30% for AVUQ.

What is the main difference between QDIV and AVUQ?

They also come from different issuers: Global X and Avantis. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for QDIV and 0.15% for AVUQ.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

QDIV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.82 vs 1.29), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.