PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QDF vs. RDVI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

QDF vs. RDVI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FlexShares Quality Dividend Index Fund (QDF) and FT Vest Rising Dividend Achievers Target Income ETF (RDVI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QDF achieves a 12.96% return, which is significantly lower than RDVI's 16.92% return.


QDF

1D
-0.15%
1M
1.30%
6M
10.89%
YTD
12.96%
1Y
24.58%
3Y*
16.91%
5Y*
11.93%
10Y*
12.04%
ALL TIME*
12.68%

RDVI

1D
0.17%
1M
1.16%
6M
12.27%
YTD
16.92%
1Y
30.02%
3Y*
18.44%
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
20.60%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$1.70M$2.15M$2.21M
$26.93M$24.23M$18.87M

QDF vs. RDVI - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
QDF
FlexShares Quality Dividend Index Fund
12.96%16.58%16.95%19.71%7.76%
RDVI
FT Vest Rising Dividend Achievers Target Income ETF
16.92%17.93%14.56%18.63%8.29%

Correlation

The correlation between QDF and RDVI is 0.85, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.85

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.82

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 20, 2022

0.85

The correlation between QDF and RDVI has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.82 to 0.85 - a consistent structural relationship.

QDF vs. RDVI - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
QDF
RDVI

Technology

37.0%
19.4%

Financial Services

14.8%
38.9%

Healthcare

9.1%
5.6%

Industrials

8.7%
12.5%

Consumer Cyclical

7.1%
11.1%

Consumer Defensive

5.7%
2.8%

Real Estate

5.6%

-

Communication Services

5.4%
4.2%

Utilities

2.2%
1.4%

Basic Materials

1.5%

-

Energy

0.9%
2.8%

Technology

QDF
37.0%
RDVI
19.4%

Financial Services

QDF
14.8%
RDVI
38.9%

Healthcare

QDF
9.1%
RDVI
5.6%

Industrials

QDF
8.7%
RDVI
12.5%

Consumer Cyclical

QDF
7.1%
RDVI
11.1%

Consumer Defensive

QDF
5.7%
RDVI
2.8%

Real Estate

QDF
5.6%
RDVI

-

Communication Services

QDF
5.4%
RDVI
4.2%

Utilities

QDF
2.2%
RDVI
1.4%

Basic Materials

QDF
1.5%
RDVI

-

Energy

QDF
0.9%
RDVI
2.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QDF vs. RDVI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

QDF
QDF Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
QDF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QDF Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
QDF Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
QDF Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
QDF Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank

RDVI
RDVI Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
RDVI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RDVI Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
RDVI Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
RDVI Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
RDVI Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

QDF vs. RDVI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FlexShares Quality Dividend Index Fund (QDF) and FT Vest Rising Dividend Achievers Target Income ETF (RDVI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


QDFRDVIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.14

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.26

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.36

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.95

3.38

-0.43

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.68

14.18

-1.50

QDF vs. RDVI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QDF Sharpe Ratio is 1.91, which is comparable to the RDVI Sharpe Ratio of 2.05. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QDF and RDVI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

QDF vs. RDVI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QDF drawdown since its inception was -36.67%, which is greater than RDVI's maximum drawdown of -18.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QDF and RDVI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QDFRDVIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-36.67%

-18.35%

-18.32%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.90%

-8.48%

+0.58%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.01%

-18.35%

+0.34%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.06%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.67%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.72%

0.00%

-0.72%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.61%

-3.07%

-0.54%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.84%

2.02%

-0.18%

Volatility

QDF vs. RDVI - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for FlexShares Quality Dividend Index Fund (QDF) is 2.96%, while FT Vest Rising Dividend Achievers Target Income ETF (RDVI) has a volatility of 3.43%. This indicates that QDF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RDVI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QDFRDVIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.96%

3.43%

-0.47%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.43%

10.96%

-1.53%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.20%

13.99%

-1.79%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.64%

16.83%

-1.19%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.37%

16.83%

+0.54%

QDF vs. RDVI - Expense Ratio Comparison

QDF has a 0.37% expense ratio, which is lower than RDVI's 0.75% expense ratio.


Dividends

QDF vs. RDVI - Dividend Comparison

QDF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.48%, less than RDVI's 7.74% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
QDF
FlexShares Quality Dividend Index Fund
1.48%1.65%1.93%2.19%2.45%1.90%2.38%3.05%4.29%2.70%3.07%3.04%
RDVI
FT Vest Rising Dividend Achievers Target Income ETF
7.74%8.10%8.62%8.45%1.53%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


QDF and RDVI have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

RDVI has higher volatility (3.43%) compared to QDF (2.96%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QDF dropped -36.67% vs RDVI's -18.35%.

On 3-year performance, RDVI leads with 18.44% vs 16.91% for QDF. On fees, QDF is cheaper at 0.37% per year. On volatility, QDF has been the lower-risk option at 2.96%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, RDVI has performed better with a 18.44% return vs 16.91%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

QDF is cheaper with a 0.37% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for RDVI.

RDVI has the higher dividend yield at 7.74%, compared with 1.48% for QDF.

QDF is categorized as Quality Factor, while RDVI is Derivative Income. QDF tracks Northern Trust Quality Dividend Index, while RDVI tracks NASDAQ US Rising Dividend Achievers. They also come from different issuers: FlexShares and FT Vest. Their fees differ too: 0.37% for QDF and 0.75% for RDVI.

RDVI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.05 vs 1.91), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QDF and RDVI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer