QDF vs. RDVI
QDF (FlexShares Quality Dividend Index Fund) and RDVI (FT Cboe Vest Rising Dividend Achievers Target Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - QDF is a Large Cap Value Equities fund tracking the Northern Trust Quality Dividend Index, while RDVI is a Derivative Income fund tracking the NASDAQ US Rising Dividend Achievers. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, QDF returned 19.21%/yr vs 18.62%/yr for RDVI. Their correlation of 0.85 suggests significant overlap in exposure. QDF charges 0.37%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for RDVI.
Performance
QDF vs. RDVI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QDF achieves a 10.70% return, which is significantly higher than RDVI's 9.43% return.
QDF
- 1D
- -0.56%
- 1M
- 4.60%
- YTD
- 10.70%
- 6M
- 10.82%
- 1Y
- 27.64%
- 3Y*
- 19.21%
- 5Y*
- 11.90%
- 10Y*
- 12.18%
RDVI
- 1D
- 0.07%
- 1M
- 2.77%
- YTD
- 9.43%
- 6M
- 10.61%
- 1Y
- 24.98%
- 3Y*
- 18.62%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
QDF vs. RDVI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QDF FlexShares Quality Dividend Index Fund | 10.70% | 16.58% | 16.95% | 19.71% | 8.68% |
RDVI FT Cboe Vest Rising Dividend Achievers Target Income ETF | 9.43% | 17.93% | 14.56% | 18.63% | 9.91% |
Correlation
The correlation between QDF and RDVI is 0.85, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.85 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.82 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 21, 2022 | 0.85 |
The correlation between QDF and RDVI has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.82 to 0.85 - a consistent structural relationship.
QDF vs. RDVI - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
QDF
RDVI
Technology
Financial Services
Industrials
Healthcare
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Consumer Defensive
Real Estate
-
Utilities
Basic Materials
-
Energy
Technology
QDF
RDVI
Financial Services
QDF
RDVI
Industrials
QDF
RDVI
Healthcare
QDF
RDVI
Consumer Cyclical
QDF
RDVI
Communication Services
QDF
RDVI
Consumer Defensive
QDF
RDVI
Real Estate
QDF
RDVI
-
Utilities
QDF
RDVI
Basic Materials
QDF
RDVI
-
Energy
QDF
RDVI
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QDF vs. RDVI — Risk / Return Rank
QDF
RDVI
QDF vs. RDVI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FlexShares Quality Dividend Index Fund (QDF) and FT Cboe Vest Rising Dividend Achievers Target Income ETF (RDVI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| QDF | RDVI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.50 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.61 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.44 | 1.34 | +0.10 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.52 | 2.96 | +0.56 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 15.37 | 12.48 | +2.89 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| QDF | RDVI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.40 | 1.89 | +0.50 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.77 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.70 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.78 | 1.19 | -0.40 |
Drawdowns
QDF vs. RDVI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QDF drawdown since its inception was -36.67%, which is greater than RDVI's maximum drawdown of -18.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QDF and RDVI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QDF | RDVI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -36.67% | -18.35% | -18.32% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.90% | -8.48% | +0.58% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.01% | -18.35% | +0.34% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.06% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -36.67% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.56% | -0.43% | -0.13% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.65% | -3.17% | -0.48% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.80% | 2.01% | -0.21% |
Volatility
QDF vs. RDVI - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for FlexShares Quality Dividend Index Fund (QDF) is 2.95%, while FT Cboe Vest Rising Dividend Achievers Target Income ETF (RDVI) has a volatility of 3.66%. This indicates that QDF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RDVI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QDF | RDVI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.95% | 3.66% | -0.71% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.76% | 10.50% | -1.74% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.60% | 13.27% | -1.67% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.60% | 16.91% | -1.31% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.39% | 16.91% | +0.48% |
QDF vs. RDVI - Expense Ratio Comparison
QDF has a 0.37% expense ratio, which is lower than RDVI's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
QDF vs. RDVI - Dividend Comparison
QDF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.50%, less than RDVI's 7.94% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QDF FlexShares Quality Dividend Index Fund | 1.50% | 1.65% | 1.93% | 2.19% | 2.45% | 1.90% | 2.38% | 3.05% | 4.29% | 2.70% | 3.07% | 3.04% |
RDVI FT Cboe Vest Rising Dividend Achievers Target Income ETF | 7.94% | 8.10% | 8.62% | 8.45% | 1.53% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
QDF and RDVI have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
RDVI has higher volatility (3.66%) compared to QDF (2.95%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QDF dropped -36.67% vs RDVI's -18.35%.
On 3-year performance, QDF leads with 19.21% vs 18.62% for RDVI. On fees, QDF is cheaper at 0.37% per year. On volatility, QDF has been the lower-risk option at 2.95%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, QDF has performed better with a 19.21% return vs 18.62%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
QDF is cheaper with a 0.37% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for RDVI.
RDVI has the higher dividend yield at 7.94%, compared with 1.50% for QDF.
QDF is categorized as Large Cap Value Equities, while RDVI is Derivative Income. QDF tracks Northern Trust Quality Dividend Index, while RDVI tracks NASDAQ US Rising Dividend Achievers. They also come from different issuers: FlexShares and FT Vest. Their fees differ too: 0.37% for QDF and 0.75% for RDVI.
QDF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.40 vs 1.89), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for QDF and RDVI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer