QDF vs. CASH.TO
QDF (FlexShares Quality Dividend Index Fund) and CASH.TO (Global X High Interest Savings ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - QDF is a Large Cap Value Equities fund tracking the Northern Trust Quality Dividend Index, while CASH.TO is a Money Market fund actively managed by Global X. QDF is passively managed, while CASH.TO is actively managed. Over the past 3 years, QDF returned 18.28%/yr vs 2.07%/yr for CASH.TO. At a 0.04 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. QDF charges 0.37%/yr vs 0.11%/yr for CASH.TO.
Performance
QDF vs. CASH.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
QDF is traded in USD, while CASH.TO is traded in CAD. To make them comparable, the CASH.TO values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QDF achieves a 10.41% return, which is significantly higher than CASH.TO's -1.09% return.
QDF
- 1D
- 0.84%
- 1M
- 1.63%
- YTD
- 10.41%
- 6M
- 9.98%
- 1Y
- 27.46%
- 3Y*
- 18.28%
- 5Y*
- 11.76%
- 10Y*
- 12.30%
CASH.TO
- 1D
- -0.16%
- 1M
- -1.63%
- YTD
- -1.09%
- 6M
- -0.39%
- 1Y
- -0.52%
- 3Y*
- 2.07%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
QDF vs. CASH.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QDF FlexShares Quality Dividend Index Fund | 10.41% | 16.58% | 16.95% | 19.71% | -12.13% | 4.77% |
CASH.TO Global X High Interest Savings ETF | -1.09% | 7.36% | -3.63% | 7.67% | -3.72% | -2.56% |
Correlation
The correlation between QDF and CASH.TO is 0.05, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.05 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.10 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 3, 2021 | 0.04 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QDF vs. CASH.TO — Risk / Return Rank
QDF
CASH.TO
QDF vs. CASH.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FlexShares Quality Dividend Index Fund (QDF) and Global X High Interest Savings ETF (CASH.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| QDF | CASH.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.16 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.97 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.39 | 1.00 | +0.39 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.29 | 0.00 | +3.28 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.15 | 0.01 | +14.14 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
QDF vs. CASH.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QDF drawdown since its inception was -36.67%, which is greater than CASH.TO's maximum drawdown of -9.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QDF and CASH.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QDF | CASH.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -36.67% | -9.29% | -27.38% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.90% | -3.03% | -4.87% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.01% | -7.69% | -10.32% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.06% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -36.67% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.81% | -2.71% | +1.90% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.64% | -2.80% | -0.84% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.84% | 1.57% | +0.27% |
Volatility
QDF vs. CASH.TO - Volatility Comparison
FlexShares Quality Dividend Index Fund (QDF) has a higher volatility of 4.16% compared to Global X High Interest Savings ETF (CASH.TO) at 0.76%. This indicates that QDF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CASH.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QDF | CASH.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.16% | 0.76% | +3.40% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.32% | 3.22% | +6.10% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.03% | 4.41% | +7.62% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.66% | 6.24% | +9.42% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.41% | 6.24% | +11.17% |
QDF vs. CASH.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
QDF has a 0.37% expense ratio, which is higher than CASH.TO's 0.11% expense ratio.
Dividends
QDF vs. CASH.TO - Dividend Comparison
QDF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.50%, less than CASH.TO's 2.19% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CASH.TO Global X High Interest Savings ETF | 2.19% | 2.53% | 4.37% | 5.05% | 2.30% | 0.10% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
QDF FlexShares Quality Dividend Index Fund | 1.50% | 1.65% | 1.93% | 2.19% | 2.45% | 1.90% | 2.38% | 3.05% | 4.29% | 2.70% | 3.07% | 3.04% |
Frequently Asked Questions
QDF and CASH.TO have a correlation of 0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, CASH.TO is cheaper at 0.11% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
CASH.TO is cheaper with a 0.11% expense ratio, compared with 0.37% for QDF.
QDF is categorized as Large Cap Value Equities, while CASH.TO is Money Market. They also come from different issuers: FlexShares and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.37% for QDF and 0.11% for CASH.TO.
Find the right allocation for QDF and CASH.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer