QDEC vs. QTEC
QDEC (FT Vest Nasdaq-100 Buffer ETF – December) and QTEC (First Trust NASDAQ-100 Technology Sector Index Fund) are both Nasdaq-100 funds. QDEC is actively managed, while QTEC is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, QDEC returned 11.18%/yr vs 17.61%/yr for QTEC. Their correlation of 0.88 suggests significant overlap in exposure. QDEC charges 0.90%/yr vs 0.57%/yr for QTEC.
Performance
QDEC vs. QTEC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QDEC achieves a 9.68% return, which is significantly lower than QTEC's 44.73% return.
QDEC
- 1D
- 0.03%
- 1M
- 3.54%
- YTD
- 9.68%
- 6M
- 11.24%
- 1Y
- 26.45%
- 3Y*
- 17.63%
- 5Y*
- 11.18%
- 10Y*
- —
QTEC
- 1D
- 0.07%
- 1M
- 22.39%
- YTD
- 44.73%
- 6M
- 40.31%
- 1Y
- 67.84%
- 3Y*
- 32.86%
- 5Y*
- 17.61%
- 10Y*
- 23.00%
QDEC vs. QTEC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QDEC FT Vest Nasdaq-100 Buffer ETF – December | 9.68% | 18.12% | 16.40% | 29.29% | -22.26% | 17.23% | 1.37% |
QTEC First Trust NASDAQ-100 Technology Sector Index Fund | 44.73% | 22.28% | 7.32% | 67.02% | -39.83% | 26.89% | 0.33% |
Correlation
The correlation between QDEC and QTEC is 0.84, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.84 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.85 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.88 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 22, 2020 | 0.88 |
The correlation between QDEC and QTEC has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.84 to 0.88 - a consistent structural relationship.
QDEC vs. QTEC - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
QDEC
QTEC
Technology
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Consumer Defensive
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
Utilities
-
Basic Materials
-
Energy
-
Financial Services
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
QDEC
QTEC
Communication Services
QDEC
QTEC
Consumer Cyclical
QDEC
QTEC
Consumer Defensive
QDEC
QTEC
-
Healthcare
QDEC
QTEC
-
Industrials
QDEC
QTEC
Utilities
QDEC
QTEC
-
Basic Materials
QDEC
QTEC
-
Energy
QDEC
QTEC
-
Financial Services
QDEC
QTEC
-
Real Estate
QDEC
QTEC
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QDEC vs. QTEC — Risk / Return Rank
QDEC
QTEC
QDEC vs. QTEC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Vest Nasdaq-100 Buffer ETF – December (QDEC) and First Trust NASDAQ-100 Technology Sector Index Fund (QTEC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| QDEC | QTEC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.72 | 2.97 | -0.26 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.83 | 3.67 | +0.16 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.52 | 1.47 | +0.05 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.55 | 4.25 | -0.70 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 17.00 | 13.77 | +3.23 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| QDEC | QTEC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.72 | 2.97 | -0.26 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.76 | 0.61 | +0.16 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.84 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.78 | 0.60 | +0.18 |
Drawdowns
QDEC vs. QTEC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QDEC drawdown since its inception was -25.25%, smaller than the maximum QTEC drawdown of -58.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QDEC and QTEC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QDEC | QTEC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -25.25% | -58.86% | +33.61% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.58% | -16.03% | +8.45% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.08% | -29.00% | +12.92% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.25% | -45.54% | +20.29% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -45.54% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.04% | -9.89% | +4.85% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.58% | 4.94% | -3.36% |
Volatility
QDEC vs. QTEC - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for FT Vest Nasdaq-100 Buffer ETF – December (QDEC) is 1.35%, while First Trust NASDAQ-100 Technology Sector Index Fund (QTEC) has a volatility of 7.34%. This indicates that QDEC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QTEC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QDEC | QTEC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.35% | 7.34% | -5.99% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.57% | 18.26% | -10.69% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.79% | 22.98% | -13.19% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.70% | 29.19% | -14.49% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.61% | 27.51% | -12.90% |
QDEC vs. QTEC - Expense Ratio Comparison
QDEC has a 0.90% expense ratio, which is higher than QTEC's 0.57% expense ratio.
Dividends
QDEC vs. QTEC - Dividend Comparison
Neither QDEC nor QTEC has paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QDEC FT Vest Nasdaq-100 Buffer ETF – December | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
QTEC First Trust NASDAQ-100 Technology Sector Index Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.02% | 0.14% | 0.15% | 0.02% | 0.44% | 0.68% | 0.91% | 0.80% | 1.29% | 0.99% |
Frequently Asked Questions
QDEC and QTEC have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
QTEC has higher volatility (7.34%) compared to QDEC (1.35%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QDEC dropped -25.25% vs QTEC's -58.86%.
On 5-year performance, QTEC leads with 17.61% vs 11.18% for QDEC. On fees, QTEC is cheaper at 0.57% per year. On volatility, QDEC has been the lower-risk option at 1.35%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, QTEC has performed better with a 17.61% return vs 11.18%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
QTEC is cheaper with a 0.57% expense ratio, compared with 0.90% for QDEC.
QDEC and QTEC have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
They also come from different issuers: FT Vest and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.90% for QDEC and 0.57% for QTEC.
QTEC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.97 vs 2.72), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for QDEC and QTEC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer