QDAY.NEO vs. GGRO.TO

Last updated Jun 16, 2026

QDAY.NEO (Hamilton EnhancedTechnology DayMAX™ ETF) and GGRO.TO (iShares ESG Growth ETF Portfolio) are both exchange-traded funds - QDAY.NEO is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by Hamilton Capital, while GGRO.TO is a Diversified Portfolio fund actively managed by iShares. Both are actively managed. A 0.71 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. QDAY.NEO charges 0.85%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for GGRO.TO.

Performance

QDAY.NEO vs. GGRO.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Hamilton EnhancedTechnology DayMAX™ ETF (QDAY.NEO) and iShares ESG Growth ETF Portfolio (GGRO.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QDAY.NEO achieves a 30.27% return, which is significantly higher than GGRO.TO's 13.16% return.

QDAY.NEO

• 1D: 3.63%
• 1M: 7.22%
• YTD: 30.27%
• 6M: 31.66%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

GGRO.TO

• 1D: 1.41%
• 1M: 5.68%
• YTD: 13.16%
• 6M: 11.03%
• 1Y: 25.16%
• 3Y*: 18.97%
• 5Y*: 11.34%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QDAY.NEO vs. GGRO.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
QDAY.NEO Hamilton EnhancedTechnology DayMAX™ ETF	30.27%	14.84%
GGRO.TO iShares ESG Growth ETF Portfolio	13.16%	6.55%

Correlation

The correlation between QDAY.NEO and GGRO.TO is 0.71, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 14, 2025	0.71

Return for Risk

QDAY.NEO vs. GGRO.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QDAY.NEO

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

GGRO.TO

GGRO.TO Risk / Return Rank: 70
GGRO.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 69
GGRO.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 68
GGRO.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 70
GGRO.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 70
GGRO.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 74

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QDAY.NEO vs. GGRO.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hamilton EnhancedTechnology DayMAX™ ETF (QDAY.NEO) and iShares ESG Growth ETF Portfolio (GGRO.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	QDAY.NEO	GGRO.TO	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	2.05	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	2.83	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.38	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	3.26	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	13.00	—

Drawdowns

QDAY.NEO vs. GGRO.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QDAY.NEO drawdown since its inception was -19.44%, smaller than the maximum GGRO.TO drawdown of -22.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QDAY.NEO and GGRO.TO.

Drawdown Indicators

	QDAY.NEO	GGRO.TO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-19.44%	-22.12%	+2.68%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-7.74%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-13.77%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-22.12%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.97%	0.00%	-0.97%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.23%	-5.22%	-0.01%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	1.94%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	QDAY.NEO	GGRO.TO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	4.56%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	10.31%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	24.37%	12.33%	+12.04%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	24.37%	15.06%	+9.31%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	24.37%	16.35%	+8.02%

QDAY.NEO vs. GGRO.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

QDAY.NEO has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than GGRO.TO's 0.25% expense ratio.

Dividends

QDAY.NEO vs. GGRO.TO - Dividend Comparison

QDAY.NEO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 14.91%, more than GGRO.TO's 1.37% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
GGRO.TO iShares ESG Growth ETF Portfolio	1.37%	1.52%	1.63%	1.89%	1.69%	1.44%	0.83%
QDAY.NEO Hamilton EnhancedTechnology DayMAX™ ETF	14.91%	8.78%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both QDAY.NEO and GGRO.TO in my portfolio?

QDAY.NEO and GGRO.TO have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, QDAY.NEO or GGRO.TO?

On fees, GGRO.TO is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, QDAY.NEO or GGRO.TO?

GGRO.TO is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for QDAY.NEO.

What is the main difference between QDAY.NEO and GGRO.TO?

QDAY.NEO is categorized as Derivative Income, while GGRO.TO is Diversified Portfolio. They also come from different issuers: Hamilton Capital and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for QDAY.NEO and 0.25% for GGRO.TO.