QCSTPX vs. GAOAX
QCSTPX (CREF Total Global Stock Account Class R2) and GAOAX (JPMorgan Global Allocation Fund A) are both Global Equities funds. Over the past year, QCSTPX returned 29.73% vs 15.60% for GAOAX. Their correlation of 0.94 suggests significant overlap in exposure.
Performance
QCSTPX vs. GAOAX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QCSTPX achieves a 12.74% return, which is significantly higher than GAOAX's 5.47% return.
QCSTPX
- 1D
- 0.53%
- 1M
- 5.39%
- YTD
- 12.74%
- 6M
- 13.56%
- 1Y
- 29.73%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GAOAX
- 1D
- 0.37%
- 1M
- 3.44%
- YTD
- 5.47%
- 6M
- 6.01%
- 1Y
- 15.60%
- 3Y*
- 11.82%
- 5Y*
- 3.10%
- 10Y*
- 6.50%
QCSTPX vs. GAOAX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
QCSTPX CREF Total Global Stock Account Class R2 | 12.74% | 20.00% | 0.00% |
GAOAX JPMorgan Global Allocation Fund A | 5.47% | 14.68% | -0.84% |
Correlation
The correlation between QCSTPX and GAOAX is 0.97 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.97 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 30, 2024 | 0.94 |
The correlation between QCSTPX and GAOAX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.94 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QCSTPX vs. GAOAX — Risk / Return Rank
QCSTPX
GAOAX
QCSTPX vs. GAOAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CREF Total Global Stock Account Class R2 (QCSTPX) and JPMorgan Global Allocation Fund A (GAOAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| QCSTPX | GAOAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.74 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.96 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.43 | 1.30 | +0.13 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.04 | 1.75 | +1.29 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.51 | 6.98 | +6.53 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| QCSTPX | GAOAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.36 | 1.62 | +0.74 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.28 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.60 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.59 | 0.61 | +0.99 |
Drawdowns
QCSTPX vs. GAOAX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QCSTPX drawdown since its inception was -16.98%, smaller than the maximum GAOAX drawdown of -29.02%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QCSTPX and GAOAX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QCSTPX | GAOAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -16.98% | -29.02% | +12.04% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.95% | -8.95% | -1.00% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -10.87% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -29.02% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -29.02% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.03% | -5.96% | +3.93% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.23% | 2.24% | -0.01% |
Volatility
QCSTPX vs. GAOAX - Volatility Comparison
CREF Total Global Stock Account Class R2 (QCSTPX) has a higher volatility of 3.75% compared to JPMorgan Global Allocation Fund A (GAOAX) at 2.81%. This indicates that QCSTPX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GAOAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QCSTPX | GAOAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.75% | 2.81% | +0.94% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.26% | 7.96% | +2.30% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.87% | 9.70% | +3.17% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.21% | 11.10% | +4.11% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.21% | 10.88% | +4.33% |
Dividends
QCSTPX vs. GAOAX - Dividend Comparison
QCSTPX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while GAOAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.15%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GAOAX JPMorgan Global Allocation Fund A | 9.15% | 10.15% | 2.34% | 0.00% | 4.62% | 4.61% | 1.54% | 2.43% | 2.52% | 2.95% | 2.59% | 0.96% |
QCSTPX CREF Total Global Stock Account Class R2 | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.97, QCSTPX and GAOAX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
QCSTPX has higher volatility (3.75%) compared to GAOAX (2.81%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QCSTPX dropped -16.98% vs GAOAX's -29.02%.
QCSTPX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.36 vs 1.62), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for QCSTPX and GAOAX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer