QCON vs. QGRO

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

QCON (American Century Quality Convertible Securities ETF) and QGRO (American Century STOXX U.S. Quality Growth ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - QCON is a Corporate Bonds fund actively managed by American Century, while QGRO is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the iSTOXX American Century USA Quality Growth (USD)(GR). QCON is actively managed, while QGRO is passively managed. QCON charges 0.32%/yr vs 0.29%/yr for QGRO.

Performance

QCON vs. QGRO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in American Century Quality Convertible Securities ETF (QCON) and American Century STOXX U.S. Quality Growth ETF (QGRO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

QCON

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.00%
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

QGRO

• 1D: -0.43%
• 1M: 4.28%
• YTD: 2.19%
• 6M: 2.57%
• 1Y: 10.81%
• 3Y*: 21.29%
• 5Y*: 12.22%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QCON vs. QGRO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
QCON American Century Quality Convertible Securities ETF	0.00%
QGRO American Century STOXX U.S. Quality Growth ETF	6.78%

QCON vs. QGRO - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	QCON	QGRO
Financial Services	7.9%	5.9%
Utilities	1.5%	0.9%
Industrials	1.0%	13.6%
Basic Materials	-	0.3%
Communication Services	-	11.0%
Consumer Cyclical	-	12.0%
Consumer Defensive	-	3.8%
Energy	-	1.8%
Healthcare	-	12.7%
Real Estate	-	0.9%
Technology	-	37.1%

Return for Risk

QCON vs. QGRO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QGRO

QGRO Risk / Return Rank: 20
QGRO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 20
QGRO Sortino Ratio Rank: 20
QGRO Omega Ratio Rank: 19
QGRO Calmar Ratio Rank: 19
QGRO Martin Ratio Rank: 22

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QCON vs. QGRO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American Century Quality Convertible Securities ETF (QCON) and American Century STOXX U.S. Quality Growth ETF (QGRO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	QCON	QGRO	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	0.71	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.58	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	—	0.67	—

Drawdowns

QCON vs. QGRO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QCON drawdown since its inception was 0.00%, smaller than the maximum QGRO drawdown of -32.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QCON and QGRO.

Drawdown Indicators

	QCON	QGRO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	0.00%	-32.56%	+32.56%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-13.54%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-23.82%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-31.86%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-0.67%	+0.67%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	0.00%	-7.68%	+7.68%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	4.03%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	QCON	QGRO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	3.38%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	11.71%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.00%	15.33%	-15.33%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	0.00%	21.06%	-21.06%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	0.00%	22.93%	-22.93%

QCON vs. QGRO - Expense Ratio Comparison

QCON has a 0.32% expense ratio, which is higher than QGRO's 0.29% expense ratio.

Dividends

QCON vs. QGRO - Dividend Comparison

QCON has not paid dividends to shareholders, while QGRO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.19%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
QCON American Century Quality Convertible Securities ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
QGRO American Century STOXX U.S. Quality Growth ETF	0.19%	0.25%	0.25%	0.41%	0.46%	0.31%	0.22%	0.38%	0.13%

Frequently Asked Questions

Which ETF is better, QCON or QGRO?

On fees, QGRO is cheaper at 0.29% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, QCON or QGRO?

QGRO is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.32% for QCON.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, QCON or QGRO?

QGRO has the higher dividend yield at 0.19%, compared with 0.00% for QCON.

What is the main difference between QCON and QGRO?

QCON is categorized as Corporate Bonds, while QGRO is Large Cap Growth Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.32% for QCON and 0.29% for QGRO.