QCON vs. LQDH
QCON (American Century Quality Convertible Securities ETF) and LQDH (iShares Interest Rate Hedged Corporate Bond ETF) are both Corporate Bonds funds. Both are actively managed. QCON charges 0.32%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for LQDH.
Performance
QCON vs. LQDH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
QCON
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.00%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
LQDH
- 1D
- -0.09%
- 1M
- 1.29%
- YTD
- 2.31%
- 6M
- 3.11%
- 1Y
- 7.62%
- 3Y*
- 8.08%
- 5Y*
- 5.28%
- 10Y*
- 4.64%
QCON vs. LQDH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
QCON American Century Quality Convertible Securities ETF | 0.00% |
LQDH iShares Interest Rate Hedged Corporate Bond ETF | 1.83% |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QCON vs. LQDH — Risk / Return Rank
QCON
LQDH
QCON vs. LQDH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American Century Quality Convertible Securities ETF (QCON) and iShares Interest Rate Hedged Corporate Bond ETF (LQDH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| QCON | LQDH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 2.83 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 1.20 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.72 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | — | 0.58 | — |
Drawdowns
QCON vs. LQDH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QCON drawdown since its inception was 0.00%, smaller than the maximum LQDH drawdown of -24.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QCON and LQDH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QCON | LQDH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | 0.00% | -24.63% | +24.63% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -2.34% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -4.86% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -7.08% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -24.63% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.09% | +0.09% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | 0.00% | -1.68% | +1.68% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 0.55% | — |
Volatility
QCON vs. LQDH - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QCON | LQDH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 0.50% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 2.03% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.00% | 2.70% | -2.70% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 0.00% | 4.41% | -4.41% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 0.00% | 6.44% | -6.44% |
QCON vs. LQDH - Expense Ratio Comparison
QCON has a 0.32% expense ratio, which is higher than LQDH's 0.25% expense ratio.
Dividends
QCON vs. LQDH - Dividend Comparison
QCON has not paid dividends to shareholders, while LQDH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.95%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LQDH iShares Interest Rate Hedged Corporate Bond ETF | 5.95% | 6.06% | 7.57% | 7.69% | 3.73% | 1.65% | 2.22% | 3.09% | 5.08% | 2.37% | 2.33% | 2.98% |
QCON American Century Quality Convertible Securities ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
On fees, LQDH is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
LQDH is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.32% for QCON.
LQDH has the higher dividend yield at 5.95%, compared with 0.00% for QCON.
They also come from different issuers: American Century and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.32% for QCON and 0.25% for LQDH.
Find the right allocation for QCON and LQDH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer